Share via

Foundry New endpoint protocol does not support workflow agents

BU XINZHE 0 Reputation points
2026-05-22T04:47:23.63+00:00

Since today (May 22, 2026 JST), all our workflow-kind agents stopped

working across multiple regions, subscriptions, and projects.

When using the LEGACY endpoint:

/applications/{agent}/protocols/activityprotocol

→ Returns: "Error creating item on conversation"

with empty item_id and empty details (no actionable info)

When using the NEW endpoint (per agent-endpoints migration doc):

/agents/{agent}/endpoint/protocols/activityprotocol

Headers: Foundry-Features: AgentEndpoints=V1Preview

→ Returns clear error:

"Endpoint-scoped routes only support prompt and hosted agents.

Agent kind 'workflow' is not supported."

This appears to be a gap in the new endpoint rollout: workflow-kind

agents are not yet supported by the new endpoint-scoped routes,

while legacy routes seem to have been altered in a way that breaks

existing workflows.

Reproduced across:

  • 2 regions (Japan East + another)
  • Multiple subscriptions
  • 4 different workflows
  • Both new and legacy projects

Request ID (new endpoint): 3213fc3f0bb834c530a1cc2d1c898fc4

Sample legacy conversation_ids:

  • conv_2d587f8e4947326800z74C9yoarf0o39zbZT6lwa4DC9zsvxt5
  • conv_b5a06d602bd9747400Fdf7NC8iuNgkENzIJWv2XgHMVPXU9zH1

Reference doc:

[https://learn.microsoft.com/エージェント アプリケーションから新しいエージェント エンドポイントへの移行 のURL]

Question:

Is workflow-kind support on the new endpoint coming soon, and is

the legacy endpoint breakage today expected or a regression?

This is currently blocking all workflow-based agent deployments

across our subscriptions.

Foundry Tools
Foundry Tools

Formerly known as Azure AI Services or Azure Cognitive Services is a unified collection of prebuilt AI capabilities within the Microsoft Foundry platform


2 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. BU XINZHE 0 Reputation points
    2026-05-22T04:50:30.1966667+00:00

    Thanks for the AI summary. To confirm: this is being treated as a

    service-side regression on the legacy workflow endpoints, since the

    documented transition guarantees backward compatibility.

    Could a moderator escalate to the Product Group? We do not have an

    Azure support plan, and this is blocking workflow-based agents

    across multiple subscriptions and regions in our organization.

    Additional Request IDs and conversation_ids available on request.

    Reproduction:

    • Multiple subscriptions, Japan East + another region
    • "Test in Playground" via workflow → fails instantly with "Error creating item on conversation"
    • New endpoint route (/agents/.../endpoint/...) → returns "Agent kind 'workflow' is not supported"

    We would appreciate confirmation of whether:

    (a) Engineering is aware of the regression

    (b) Workflow-kind support on the new endpoint is on the roadmap

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments

  2. AI answer

    2026-05-22T04:47:40.68+00:00

    Workflow-kind agents are currently not listed as supported on the new agent endpoint-scoped routes. The documented support on the new model explicitly calls out prompt and hosted agents as the primary agent types, and the migration guidance focuses on moving from legacy Agent Applications and project endpoints to the new stable agent endpoint for those agents.

    From the migration documentation:

    • New agent endpoints (/agents/{agent}/endpoint/...) are the stable, consumer-facing endpoints tied to the new agent object model.
    • The new endpoint experience and features (traffic splitting, multiple protocols, enable/disable, A2A, direct publish to M365/Teams) are described in the context of the new agent types and do not mention workflow-kind agents.
    • Legacy Agent Applications and project endpoints continue to be supported during the transition period and are expected to keep working until an announced end-of-support date.

    Given this, the behavior observed on the new endpoint (Agent kind 'workflow' is not supported.) is consistent with current documented capabilities: endpoint-scoped routes only support prompt and hosted agents at this time. The documentation does not state that workflow-kind agents are supported on the new endpoint, nor does it provide a timeline or commitment that workflow-kind support is “coming soon.”

    Regarding the legacy endpoint behavior (“Error creating item on conversation” with empty details), the migration and FAQ documentation explicitly state that:

    • Legacy Agent Applications and legacy agents continue to work during the transition.
    • Agent Application deprecation and end-of-support are planned and will be announced, with a migration period.

    There is no indication in the provided documentation that legacy workflow endpoints are expected to break at this time or that such a change is part of the planned migration steps. The described sudden failure across regions and subscriptions therefore aligns more with a regression or service-side incident than with an intentional, documented deprecation.

    Based on the available documentation:

    • Workflow-kind agents are not currently supported on the new endpoint-scoped routes, and there is no published ETA or commitment in the docs for adding that support.
    • Legacy endpoints (including those used by workflow-based agents) are expected to remain functional during the transition and until an announced end-of-support date, so the breakage observed today is not described as expected behavior in the documentation and should be treated as a potential regression or service incident.

    For a blocking, cross-region issue like this, the next step is to open an Azure support case with the request IDs and affected regions so the product group can investigate the regression on the legacy workflow endpoints.


    References:

    AI-generated content may be incorrect. Read our transparency notes for more information.

    Was this answer helpful?

Your answer

Answers can be marked as 'Accepted' by the question author and 'Recommended' by moderators, which helps users know the answer solved the author's problem.