Share via

How Many Versions Of Microsoft .NET Framework Should be Running Concurrently

Anonymous
2011-01-20T00:19:43+00:00

Do I need to have Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1, Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Service Pack 2, Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Service Pack 2, Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1, Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0 Client Profile and  Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0 Extended running concurrently?  I would like to remove the programs that aren't needed to free up disk space.

Windows for home | Previous Windows versions | Apps

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

Answer accepted by question author

Anonymous
2011-01-20T01:33:06+00:00

On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:19:43 +0000, Just Trying To Learn wrote:

Do I need to have Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1, Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Service Pack 2, Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Service Pack 2, Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1, Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0 Client Profile and  Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0 Extended running concurrently?  I would like to remove the programs that aren't needed to free up disk space. 

Three points:

  1. You need each version if you want to run a program that needs that

version. You may or may not need them all, depending on what programs

you run.

  1. Each of them uses only a tiny amount of disk space.
  2. Given that each uses only a tiny amount of disk space, in my view

it's a mistake to remove any of them. Even if you don't need them all

today, tomorrow you may need another one.


Ken Blake (MS MVP)

Was this answer helpful?

2 people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments

10 additional answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2014-09-07T07:44:01+00:00

    Going to Necro this post just to say that yes, you are a bloody idiot! Don't know where you live but where I am a 1TB SSD costs $500....I can build a new pc with a standard SATA HD for that......So yeah, people who went out an bought an SSD or even a pc that came with one don't have much space.

    Telling someone that they are an idiot because they may not have the actual space due to limitations in;

    A) Budget

    B) Availability

    or C) It's what came with it, is completely idiotic. It was a simple and legitimate question as some programs when they update do not remove older copies (most do now but there are a select few that don't).

    There are people out there that don't know much about the software running their computers, and you can't put them at fault for asking questions so that they can LEARN. Ed was standing up for a person who was asking so that they can learn and you just had to come along to rip at him and the OP. You have an issue with helping people then don't ever come back to a tech support forum. Yeah I saw you whine about how you've been doing it for blah blah blah......I help people with their issues and no matter what I know that no question is a stupid question. You never know what their current or past history with computers are, and you don't know if say, this is the first Windows computer that they have owned. I know a lot of people who will only use Linux or MAC and when you put them on a Windows PC they can't figure it out as quick as someone raised off Windows.

    So don't go around running people down because they don't know as much as you but want to learn, GOT IT!

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2012-11-06T16:44:11+00:00

    On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:54:26 +0000, EdTenderle wrote:

    Dear Ken,

    I don't know exactly what you consider tiny. Perhaps you are from Texas or Alaska. On one of my systems, I am looking at just now, .NET Framework in all its versions is sitting on roughly 600MB of space. This in no way strikes me or really anyone I have asked as "tiny." Perhaps you consider it miniscule relative to some other pasta code behemoth. 

    These days you can buy a 120GB hard drive for around $60, At that

    price, 600MB is about 3 US pennies worth. Yes, I consider 3 pennies

    worth to be tiny.

    And a 120GB drive is smaller than most people have these days. If you

    have a bigger drive, the cost per GB is even lower, so the 600MB might

    well be even less than one penny's worth.

    Back in the days of my first personal computer (1987) I had a 20MB

    hard drive that cost around $200. At that price, 600MB was worth about

    $6,000. $6,000 worth of disk space certainly wasn't tiny, but those

    days are long gone.

    Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP

    Hi,

    I know this is months old, but seriously this guy should lose his MVP status (or at least the V). Do they not have SSD's in Micro$oft land?

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2012-02-11T18:50:25+00:00

    On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:54:26 +0000, EdTenderle wrote:

    Dear Ken,

    I don't know exactly what you consider tiny. Perhaps you are from Texas or Alaska. On one of my systems, I am looking at just now, .NET Framework in all its versions is sitting on roughly 600MB of space. This in no way strikes me or really anyone I have asked as "tiny." Perhaps you consider it miniscule relative to some other pasta code behemoth. 

    These days you can buy a 120GB hard drive for around $60, At that
    price, 600MB is about 3 US pennies worth. Yes, I consider 3 pennies
    worth to be tiny.

    And a 120GB drive is smaller than most people have these days. If you
    have a bigger drive, the cost per GB is even lower, so the 600MB might
    well be even less than one penny's worth.

    Back in the days of my first personal computer (1987) I had a 20MB
    hard drive that cost around $200. At that price, 600MB was worth about
    $6,000. $6,000 worth of disk space certainly wasn't tiny, but those
    days are long gone.

    Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2012-02-11T07:54:26+00:00

    Dear Ken,

    I don't know exactly what you consider tiny. Perhaps you are from Texas or Alaska. On one of my systems, I am looking at just now, .NET Framework in all its versions is sitting on roughly 600MB of space. This in no way strikes me or really anyone I have asked as "tiny." Perhaps you consider it miniscule relative to some other pasta code behemoth.

    Rather than attempting to dismiss the question by trivializing it ... evidently Just Trying To Learn doesn't feel the footprint is particularly tiny either ... you might have shown off what you know and informed him and the others how one determines which programs are or are not using a specific version of .NET Framework.  That might actually be useful to share.

    So how about a real answer, preferably from someone who has one? Perhaps there is no one anymore at MS who actually knows these kinds of things.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments