Site feedback

wavemaster avatar image
1 Vote"
wavemaster suggested TracyMyles commented

wasted time again posting here - 1000 chars max response

This is a technical platform, sometimes a response ends up being more than 1000 characters to clearly explain a point.

Who cares if it 1000, 1500 or 3000?

If you worry about small stuff like this then your cloud hosting provider is too expensive. ;)






qna-feedback
· 1
5 |1600 characters needed characters left characters exceeded

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 3.0 MiB each and 30.0 MiB total.

@wavemaster, thank you for the feedback. We are reviewing it and we will be updating this item once we finish the review.

0 Votes 0 ·

1 Solution

cheong00 avatar image
0 Votes"
cheong00 commented cheong00 edited

This is currently under review.

Btw, I think the primary reason is not the cost, or they would have limited the size of "answers" too.

IMO, it make sense to limit text length for "comments on question" as you're not quite suppose to post code there (the asker should amend the question with these detail if there is a need to post code to further describe the case), however the text length for "comments on answer" should be relaxed.

5 |1600 characters needed characters left characters exceeded

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 3.0 MiB each and 30.0 MiB total.

Your Opinion Counts

Share your feedback, or help out by voting for other people's feedback.