issue with mail loop (contact with non-existent internal address), exchange 2016 CU23

dave na 1 Reputation point
2022-12-14T09:57:18.393+00:00

In our Exchange 2016 Cu23 + November SU environment consisting of several internal servers and edge we got a strange problem with mail routing: an inattentive HD employee created contact with an internal but non-existent address and included it in the distribution group.

After several messages were sent to this group, for some reason they were forwarded to the edge server, which again forwarded them to the internal servers, which again tried to send them outside. It is difficult to count the number of such cycles, but a 2-kilobyte message has grown to 14 megabytes due to service headers. As a result, this led to the queue file took up all available space and the delivery of external mail obviously stopped.

There are no extraneous transport agents on the internal servers, DKIM signer and antivirus/antispam are installed on edge.
It is completely unclear for what reason the message was sent to the edge server (despite the fact that our domain is set as authoritative), there are no integrations with clouds/Office 365.
And it is also completely unclear why the emails were not deleted due to exceeding the number of hops.

Unfortunately, I can't remember if we had similar problems earlier, but this week 2 similar mistakes have already been made by helpdesk employees, so I expect this to happen again in the future. The only thing that makes the situation a little easier is the relatively moderate growth rate of the queue - about 10gb per hour.

Please suggest this expected behavior or we have encountered a bug in the product

Exchange Server Management
Exchange Server Management
Exchange Server: A family of Microsoft client/server messaging and collaboration software.Management: The act or process of organizing, handling, directing or controlling something.
7,832 questions
{count} votes

Your answer

Answers can be marked as Accepted Answers by the question author, which helps users to know the answer solved the author's problem.