This question and topic follows the following one created by Anonymous on May 24, 2025:
"How is it even legal for microsoft to lock people out of there computers with bitlocker?"
Since the question has been conveniently locked and one cannot reply to the "Accepted answer" written by user @quietman7 MVP Alumni , here's a new similar question, developing more relevant points.
- People are not just being locked out of their computers, which can always be re-formatted and re-installed (paying a certain price in terms of time, efforts, complications, and in some cases money). People are being locked out of their data, which is much worse! A computer can be recovered, lost data cannot.
- User quietman7 MVP Alumni states: "There is nothing illegal in regards to your issue". Quite the opposite! Or at least it should be illegal if it's not. This definitely should be illegal. Let me prove it to us all with a more tangible example.
In the end, data is data, regardless of where it is saved, if for example in a computer hard disk drive or handwritten with a pen on old-fashioned paper notebooks, or printed on Kodak photographic paper. What Microsoft (in case of automatic Windows updates) and computer manufacturers (in case of purchasing a new computer) are doing, corresponds to the following scenario:
Imagine a Microsoft employee (in case of updates), or a Dell/Lenovo/HP/Whatever other brand employee (in case of new PC purchases) reaches your home or workplace, enters, opens your cabinet drawers and pulls out ALL your documents, all of them: official papers, tax papers, personal and family memories and photographs, magazines, books, hobby stuff, everything, whatever 'data' you have. Then they cut and scramble the data entirely, in a way that only knowing a certain 'scrambling key' can restore them. Then they store this key.... on the ground, on the street!!!! knowing that, sooner or later, wind and stuff are going to take that key away, and they DON'T WARN YOU on what they've just done!
In this scenario, you must intuit on your own power of intuition what just happened. And you must intuit, and do it quickly, that you have to run outside, on the street, grab that key and store it safely!
Since you don't have supernatural powers, if they don't clearly and explicitly tell, inform, and warn you on what they've just done, you're not going to save that key anywhere. Until, one day, wind will blow the key away from the street, you'll open your folder cabinet looking for that important document or deceased relative picture, and you'll find just a pile of useless codes. Somebody has just destroyed your data.
How is that not illegal?
You have just lost everything, things that can never be recovered. Things that not even all the money of the world would be able to re-buy.
In other words: how is it not illegal if I take all your data, scramble it, throw the key away knowing that it will be lost, NOT inform you about it, and time-bomb it so that, suddenly, one day, you lose everything?
CONCLUSION:
How could this barbaric abuse and crime be at least barely 'tolerable'? In two cases:
• WINDOWS UPDATES: If I send an update in your computer and (potentially) disintegrate all your data (unless you retrieve a certain key and save it somewhere), you must be informed. I must make a huge, gigantic, warning sign appear on your screen repeatedly, until you have acknowledged unequivocally that you have read it, understood it, and that you have saved the key somewhere safe.
• OEMs' PRE-ENCRYPTED COMPUTERS: If I sell you a computer which automatically (potentially) destroys all your data as you save it (unless you retrieve a certain key and save it somewhere), you must be informed. I must at least add a huge, clear, and visible warning note inside the box, so that when you buy it and open the box you are certainly informed and made aware of the fact that you must retrieve and save the key and of the risk of not doing it.
Data is property, and invaluable property, since it's unique and cannot be purchased. If I do something to your property or modify it in a way that causes it to self-destruct sooner or later, unless you do something before, I must absolutely inform you that you must do something. Otherwise, I am responsible for destroying your property.
The fact that the bomb does not explode immediately but is time-rigged and will explode later, doesn't make the person who set it up less guilty of the destruction that will follow.