Channels and Subordinate Channels / Custom Organization within a Team

Question

Channels and Subordinate Channels / Custom Organization within a Team

TWright 0

My organization has many cross functional coordination efforts. The proliferation of teams is increasingly difficult to keep track of. It would be very helpful if we could build our GrandParent (Team), with parent channels, and subordinate (child) channels. And then organize them by function and permissions. Is this something that can be done or does it require a software change within MS Teams? MS, will you make this change?

Moved from: Microsoft Teams | Development

2 answers

Your answer

Answer 1

Hi @TWright,

Thank you for posting your question in the Microsoft Q&A forum.

I understand the challenge you’re facing with the growing number of cross‑functional coordination efforts and the difficulty of keeping track of multiple Teams and channels. What you’re describing a hierarchical structure where a “GrandParent” Team contains parent channels and those channels contain subordinate (child) channels is a common request, and it would certainly help many organizations manage complexity more effectively.

At this time, Microsoft Teams does not support creating sub channels or any hierarchy below the current channel level. The existing Teams structure works as follows: (You could refer to the information generate above)

A Team is the top level container for people, content, and tools.
A Team is made up of channels, which are the collaboration spaces where work happens.
Channels are flat within a Team there is no built in concept of nested, subordinate, or child channels.

Channels can be:

Standard channels visible to all team members
Private channels visible only to a subset of members
Shared channels for collaboration inside and outside the organization

However, none of these channel types support sub channels or multi level hierarchies. Achieving the structure you described would currently require a change in the Teams product itself.

I completely understand why this capability would be valuable for your organization’s workflows, especially when coordinating across many functions. Many customers have expressed similar needs for deeper channel organization and permission granularity within Teams.

Because this is a product level design limitation, the best way to request this enhancement is to submit feedback directly to the Microsoft Teams product group. They actively monitor customer suggestions, and many new features come directly from user feedback.

How to submit your suggestion:

Visit the Microsoft Feedback Portal
Navigate to Microsoft Teams · Community
Select Send feedback
Provide a clear description of your request
(e.g., “Enable hierarchical or nested channels within a Team to improve organization and permission management.”)

As moderators, I don’t have the ability to change Teams’ current architecture, but I'm always happy to explain what is and isn’t possible today and guide you to the right place for suggestions.

Thank you again for taking the time to share your idea. While this may not provide an immediate solution, I hope it clearly outlines the current Teams structure and the appropriate path for requesting this enhancement.

If the answer is helpful, please click "Accept Answer" and kindly upvote it. If you have extra questions about this answer, please click "Comment".     

Note: Please follow the steps in our documentation to enable e-mail notifications if you want to receive the related email notification for this thread   

Answer 2

Nested or hierarchical channels (grandparent → parent → child channels) are not supported in Microsoft Teams today.

Current Teams structure is:

A team is the top-level container for people, content, and tools.
A team is made up of channels, which are the collaboration spaces where work happens.
Channels are flat within a team; there is no built‑in concept of sub‑channels or subordinate channels.
Channels can be:
- Standard – visible to all team members.
- Private – visible only to a subset of team members.
- Shared – for collaborating with people inside and outside the team.

Relevant details from the product behavior:

“Each Team is comprised of one or more channels. You can organize your Teams in any way that fits your workflow.” Channels are the focus areas within the team, each with its own files library.
“Teams are made up of two types of channels — standard (available and visible to everyone) and private (focused, private conversations with a specific audience).” Shared channels are also available for cross‑team/org collaboration.
“You can't convert a standard channel to a private channel and vice versa,” and channels are not described as having sub‑levels; they are peers within the team.

To approximate the hierarchy and permission model described, organizations typically use a combination of:

Multiple teams (for major functions or programs) and channels (for specific topics/projects) rather than nested channels.
Private channels inside a team to restrict access for sensitive sub‑topics.
Shared channels when collaboration is needed with people outside the parent team or organization.

Implementing true nested channels would require a product change by Microsoft. The provided documentation does not describe such a feature or any configuration to enable it, so it cannot be done with current Teams capabilities.

For feature requests such as hierarchical channels, the usual path is to submit feedback through the Teams client (Help → Give feedback) or via Microsoft’s public feedback channels, but those processes and commitments are not covered in the provided context.

References:

Share via

Channels and Subordinate Channels / Custom Organization within a Team

2 answers

Your answer