Additional Microsoft Defender tools and services that provide security across various platforms and environments
Hi @KinghornAdmin ,
Yes, Microsoft update content can legitimately be delivered through CDN/edge infrastructure rather than from an IP range that looks directly owned by Microsoft. Microsoft’s Windows Update security documentation says downloads are load-balanced through CDNs, and Microsoft does not provide fixed IP addresses or IP ranges for Windows Update exceptions because they can change over time.
For Microsoft Defender Antivirus specifically, security intelligence and platform updates are delivered through Windows Update, and Defender can be configured to use sources such as Microsoft Update, WSUS, Configuration Manager, UNC share, or Microsoft security intelligence updates depending on your fallback order.
So the answer is: third-party CDN delivery can be normal, but I would not validate it by IP address alone. For the specific range 173.46.83.200/29, I would not assume it is legitimate just because it appeared during Defender updates. Instead, check the full context:
Which process initiated the download: Windows Update / Delivery Optimization / Defender
The requested hostname, URL, SNI, or proxy log destination
Whether the downloaded file is Microsoft-signed
Whether the activity lines up with Defender update events and KB2267602/security intelligence update timing
If you need strict egress control, it is better to allow the documented Microsoft/Windows Update/Defender endpoints or use WSUS/Configuration Manager as the controlled update source, rather than trying to maintain static CDN IP allowlists. Microsoft’s documentation explicitly warns that IP ranges can change due to load balancing/CDN behavior