<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
  version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Musings of a Premier Support Technical Account Manager</title>
    <atom:link
      href="https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/feed.xml"
      rel="self"
      type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/feed.xml</link>
    <description />
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:30:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <item>
      <title>Missed TechEd 2012? Don't miss out on the content!</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/missed-teched-2012-dont-miss-out-on-the-content</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:15:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[AnthonyBennett]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/anthoben/2012/11/29/missed-teched-2012-dont-miss-out-on-the-content/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In my travels I've found that a lot of people don't know that the TechEd sessions were recorded and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my travels I've found that a lot of people don't know that the TechEd sessions were recorded and are available FOR FREE to watch on-line or download</p>
<p>So, if you couldn't make it to the Gold Coast in September, or even if you did make it but found you had to miss a session due to a scheduling conflict, go to</p>
<p><strong>TechEd Australia 2012</strong><br /><strong><a href="https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/TechEd/Australia/2012">https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/TechEd/Australia/2012</a></strong></p>
<p>One of my favourites was presented by Ben Armstrong, owner of the &ldquo;Virtual PC Guy" blog and a Senior Program Manager in the Windows team.</p>
<p><strong>Hyper-V Performance, Scale &amp; Architecture Changes</strong><br /><strong><a href="https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/TechEd/Australia/2012/VIR413">https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/TechEd/Australia/2012/VIR413</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exchange+Outlook+Mobile Devices+PAs+Executives=Sadness for the IT Admin</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/exchangeoutlookmobile-devicespasexecutivessadness-for-the-it-admin</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[AnthonyBennett]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/anthoben/2012/11/06/exchangeoutlookmobile-devicespasexecutivessadness-for-the-it-admin/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[[updated 9th May 2013 with additional content]
In my role, I see a lot of different issues that...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[updated 9th May 2013 with additional content]</strong></p>
<p>In my role, I see a lot of different issues that customers face. Not just my customers past and present, but through talking to my colleagues about their customers.</p>
<p>Over time, you do start to see some issues that&nbsp;occur time and again... and again... and again. Sometimes this can be in the same customer, but as staff come and go, I'm the one that suffers deja vu as I have the same conversation for the nth time in the same customer.</p>
<p>One of these topics is Calendars. In particular, the sanctity of the calendar of an executive, with a PA/EA, and a mobile device... sometimes two (devices... not PAs).</p>
<p>These issues are always hard to resolve because it's commonly not a software issue, and sometimes not just people and/or process. It's usually a combination of factors.</p>
<p>Troubleshooting is hard because the impacted people are generally hard to pin down to get some troubleshooting time, but also have the loudest voices.</p>
<p>Is there a Silver Bullet? Sure. Ban mobile devices and delegated mailboxes and ensure the executive only uses Outlook or OWA. Yeah, good luck with that. But it would solve the problem. I guarantee it.</p>
<p>So, back to reality. What to do in this situation?</p>
<p>There are some really good articles that Microsoft and&nbsp;others have already&nbsp;written on this topic, so I won't attempt to re-write what has already been published.</p>
<p>The following articles are aimed at IT folks but they articulate the broad issue and solutions in great detail:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Comprehensive Guide on Addressing Exchange Calendaring Issues</strong><br /><strong>Lost Appointments, Duplicate Appointments, Odd Delegate Issues, etc</strong><br /><strong><a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/ExchangeCalendaringProblemSolutions">http://www.networkworld.com/community/ExchangeCalendaringProblemSolutions</a></strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Exchange Outlook Calendaring Problems (lost meetings, delegate problems, etc)</strong><br /><strong>Solving Exchange Outlook Calendaring Delegation Lost Meeting Problems</strong><br /><strong><a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/exchange-outlook-calendaring-problems-lost-me">http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/exchange-outlook-calendaring-problems-lost-me</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The quintessential document that should be printed out and stuck in the cubicle of every EA/PA and Executive is this one:</p>
<p>If using Outlook 2000, Outlook 2002/XP, or Outlook 2003 (aside from the fact that you really, REALLY need to upgrade!):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Outlook meeting requests: Essential do&rsquo;s and don&rsquo;ts</strong><br /><strong><a href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook-help/outlook-meeting-requests-essential-dos-and-donts-HA001127678.aspx">http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook-help/outlook-meeting-requests-essential-dos-and-donts-HA001127678.aspx</a></strong></p>
<p>If using Outlook 2007, Outlook 2010, or Outlook 2013:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Best practices when using the Outlook Calendar</strong><br /><strong><a href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook-help/best-practices-when-using-the-outlook-calendar-HA104004449.aspx">http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook-help/best-practices-when-using-the-outlook-calendar-HA104004449.aspx</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The following article very neatly consolidates much of our guidance that are in more in-depth KB articles and talks specifically to best practices when using mobile devices:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Exchange Calendaring Issues: Best Practices for Outlook and Mobile Device Users &amp; their Delegates</strong><br /><strong><a href="http://ike.its.uiowa.edu/article/3521">http://ike.its.uiowa.edu/article/3521</a></strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Some best practices when working with Outlook Calendar</strong><br /><strong><a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/outlooking/archive/2010/03/29/some-best-practices-when-working-with-outlook-calendar.aspx">http://blogs.technet.com/b/outlooking/archive/2010/03/29/some-best-practices-when-working-with-outlook-calendar.aspx</a></strong><br />&nbsp;</p>
<p>Lastly, some Microsoft troubleshooting guides and general resources to stay on top of:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Description of common scenarios in which Calendar information may be removed from the Calendar or may be inaccurate</strong><br /><strong><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899704">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899704</a></strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>How to troubleshoot missing and duplicate appointments in Outlook</strong><br /><strong><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890436">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890436</a></strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Current issues with Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync and third-party devices</strong><br /><strong><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2563324">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2563324</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There&nbsp;were&nbsp;technical issues that contributed to an increase in calendaring issue&nbsp;when Apple released&nbsp;iOS6 and existed in iOS 6.0, 6.0.1 and 6.0.2. The issue is&nbsp;well documented on the internet and broadly called "meeting hijacking" so if you have iOS users, ensure they upgrade. References:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Meeting in Attendee&rsquo;s Calendar Loses Track of the Meeting Organizer</strong><br /><strong><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2768774">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2768774</a></strong></p>
<p><br />So, what if nothing is working out and you need to call Microsoft for assistance? Firstly, get yourself some Premier Support if you don't have it already (see my earlier post about Premier Support). Now, in preparation, read the following&nbsp;TechNet article:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Working with support to troubleshoot the Outlook calendar in an Exchange environment</strong><br /><strong><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc891495(v=Office.12).aspx">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc891495(v=Office.12).aspx</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>May your mobile devices and Exchange (and Executives and their Assistants) all play nicely together and let you get on with more important stuff!</p>
<p>P.S. A big thank you to my colleague Quoc Lai, a Senior Premier Field Engineer in the Messaging space here at Microsoft, who has done many Exchange Risk Assessments with me and my customers and drilled into me all of the above! I know he does it in the hope that I'll stop ringing him every 6 months saying "Hey Quoc, customer X are having a major calendaring issue. Do you think you could come on-site with me... Quoc? Hello? Huh... I seem to have strong mobile signal but the line went dead... Quoc?"</p>
<p>P.P.S. Hi Steve and thanks for reading my blog :)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Technical Case Study - How Microsoft IT used a WDRAP engagement to improve desktop performance</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/technical-case-study-how-microsoft-it-used-a-wdrap-engagement-to-improve-desktop-performance</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:24:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[AnthonyBennett]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/anthoben/2011/12/20/technical-case-study-how-microsoft-it-used-a-wdrap-engagement-to-improve-desktop-performance/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A key part of what we deliver in Premier Support are Risk Assessment Programs around a specific...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A key part of what we deliver in Premier Support are Risk Assessment Programs around a specific technology. To describe these engagement in one sentence, they are designed to help us assess the current state (people, process and technology) and give us a roadmap for remediation with a goal of improving the way the service is being operated and maintained with a view of improving availability, performance, and improving efficieny of operation. Having managed the delivery of many of these engagements over the years, across many technologies (Active Directory, Exchange, SharePoint, Windows Desktop, System Center Configuration Manager, etc.) it is easy for me to articulate to my customers the outcome and value these will deliver. I, however, can not be everywhere, talking to every customer (unfortauntely).</p>
<p>This month a Technical Case Study was published on how&nbsp;Microsoft IT used a Windows Desktop Risk Assessment Program (WDRAP) engagement, delivered by Premier Field Engineering (PFE)&nbsp;to improve desktop performance of our own internal users. We have approximately 100,000 users around the globe. They (er... we) are generally <strong>very</strong> demanding on our internal IT Departments. Unlike most corporate environments, every user is a local Administrator on your machine (pretty much&nbsp;everyone has laptops) and we have a huge choice in the make and model of machines we can use. This makes for an interesting challenge in defining and optimizing a Windows 7 SOE.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><b>Improving Desktop Performance with the Risk and Health Assessment Program for Windows Desktop</b></p>
<p><b><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh708771.aspx">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh708771.aspx</a></b></p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First it was 'Gmail Man', now it's 'Tad from VMlimited'..</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/first-it-was-gmail-man-now-its-tad-from-vmlimited</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 01:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[AnthonyBennett]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/anthoben/2011/08/31/first-it-was-gmail-man-now-its-tad-from-vmlimited/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm loving the fact that we are creating these amusing videos to take pot-shots at our...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm loving the fact that we are creating these amusing videos to take pot-shots at our competitors.</p>
<p>In case you had seen it, first there was the 'Gmail Man' video (promoting Office 365 over Google Gmail):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXqrTfOWx60">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXqrTfOWx60</a></p>
<p>and this week, to coincide with VMware's VMworld, we released this one:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hewedqvSWaI">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hewedqvSWaI</a></p>
<p>which let's us follow the exploits of Tad from VMlimited who is stuck in the past (figureatively and literally) with his view on Private Clouds..</p>
<p>Yes, there will be people crying out that we're spreading FUD, and lies, and causing global warming, but still, it's damn funny and unlike the old Mac vs PC ads that Apple ran, not based on complete lies...</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is Premier Support? But don't bore me OK?</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/what-is-premier-support-but-dont-bore-me-ok</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:22:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[AnthonyBennett]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/anthoben/2011/08/17/what-is-premier-support-but-dont-bore-me-ok/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Microsoft UK subsidiary has a great 2min 17sec stick-figure video that does a great job of...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Microsoft UK subsidiary has a great 2min 17sec stick-figure video that does a great job of explaining what Microsoft Premier Support is all about is a fun non-boring (IMHO) fashion.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Premier Support - Animated Slideshow</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/showcase/en/gb/details/2c708e45-71a7-46d3-81d6-88ab9c749d74">http://www.microsoft.com/showcase/en/gb/details/2c708e45-71a7-46d3-81d6-88ab9c749d74</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>[Video]]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VMware VTAX, Windows Server “8” Hyper-V, and Hyper-V Replica</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/vmware-vtax-windows-server-8-hyper-v-and-hyper-v-replica</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 01:02:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[AnthonyBennett]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/anthoben/2011/08/03/vmware-vtax-windows-server-8-hyper-v-and-hyper-v-replica/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Jeff Woolsey recently posted an article that is well worth reading, primarily about the VMware VTAX...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Woolsey recently posted an article that is well worth reading, primarily about the VMware VTAX and showing some examples of licensing cost comparisons of common VSphere 5.0 configurations vs. Hyper-V, but also talking about some of the new features of Windows Server &ldquo;8&rdquo; Hyper-V, namely Hyper-V Replica.</p>
<p>You'll find the article on the Microsoft Windows Virtualization Team Blog here - <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2011/08/01/beware-the-vmware-memory-vtax-plus-good-news-for-hyper-v.aspx">http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualization/archive/2011/08/01/beware-the-vmware-memory-vtax-plus-good-news-for-hyper-v.aspx</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Installing Windows Service Pack (and some updates) fails on DPM Servers</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/installing-windows-service-pack-and-some-updates-fails-on-dpm-servers</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:39:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[AnthonyBennett]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/anthoben/2011/06/13/installing-windows-service-pack-and-some-updates-fails-on-dpm-servers/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I've had two customers recently run into the issue of the installation of SP1 for Windows Server...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've had two customers recently run into the issue of the installation of SP1 for Windows Server 2008 R2 failing on their Data Protection Manager (DPM) servers (in this case, DPM 2010 but same would apply to DPM 2007).</p>
<p>The problem arises because during the installation,&nbsp;driver-servicing will enumerate the driver information in the registry. There is a default time-out of 15 min for this process,&nbsp;however, on DPM servers where there is a large number of snapshots, it doesn't finish the enumeration process within the 15 min time period and therefore the SP1 install fails.</p>
<p>After engaging Premier Support, the work-around that my customers have successfully employed is as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>On the server open the registry by running regedit.exe</li>
<li>Navigate to <strong>HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\TrustedInstaller</strong></li>
<li>Find&nbsp;the registry value <strong>BlockTimeIncrement. </strong>By default this is set to <strong>384 </strong>(15 min); change it to <strong>2a30</strong> (3 hours). If you receive an error while trying to change the value you may need to change the permissions on the TrustedInstaller key to Full Control for Users.</li>
<li>Reboot the server, then install SP1.</li>
</ol>
<p>My customers found that it took anywhere between 25 mins and 1.5 hours for the SP1 install to complete depending on the number of snapshots. After the SP1 install is complete you can either revert the change or leave it in place.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ZOMG! The super important &lt;snarf&gt; system is running on an evaluation version of SQL Server and it's about to expire!!!</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/zomg-the-super-important-snarf-system-is-running-on-an-evaluation-version-of-sql-server-and-its-about-to-expire</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:25:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[AnthonyBennett]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/anthoben/2011/06/07/zomg-the-super-important-snarf-system-is-running-on-an-evaluation-version-of-sql-server-and-its-about-to-expire/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I run into this about once every 18 months.. my customers are all pretty smart and 'don't do dumb...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run into this about once every 18 months.. my customers are all pretty smart and 'don't do dumb stuff' like this but inevitably some company acquisition or rogue division that lived outside of the jurisdiction of central IT presents this scenario. Because we don't have a consistent story across every single product I can never remember the correct answer to the inevitable question "Can we upgrade the evalaution version of SQL Server 2005/2008/2008 R2 to a licensed version without having to re-install?". Like a goldfish that is (allegedly) always pleasantly surprised by the new surroundings of the same old fish bowl, I'm always pleased to find that the answer is Yes, you can 'upgrade' an evaluation version of SQL Server to a full licensed version (staying on the same version number of course).</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><b>Version and Edition Upgrades<br /></b><b><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143393(v=SQL.90).aspx">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143393(v=SQL.90).aspx</a></b></p>
<p>Process to upgrade:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><b>How to: Upgrade to a Different Edition of SQL Server 2008 (Setup)<br /></b><b><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc707783(v=SQL.100).aspx">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc707783(v=SQL.100).aspx</a></b></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><b>How to: Upgrade to a Different Edition of SQL Server 2008 R2 (Setup)<br /></b><b><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc707783(v=SQL.105).aspx">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc707783(v=SQL.105).aspx</a></b></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><b>Upgrade from SQL Server Evaluation Edition to full blown editions? (SQL Server 2005)<br /></b><b><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sanchan/archive/2006/07/27/681086.aspx">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sanchan/archive/2006/07/27/681086.aspx</a></b></p>
<p>In 18 months time when I get asked again (although hopefully for Denali rather than SQL Server 2005), hopefully my Bing search will find this page!</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Which software vendor has the most reported vulnerabilities? You might be surprised....</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/which-software-vendor-has-the-most-reported-vulnerabilities-you-might-be-surprised</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:41:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[AnthonyBennett]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/anthoben/2010/07/23/which-software-vendor-has-the-most-reported-vulnerabilities-you-might-be-surprised/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Secunia's Half Year Report 2010 has some results that surprised me, and I'm sure it'll surprise many...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secunia's Half Year Report 2010 has some results that surprised me, and I'm sure it'll surprise many others. Microsoft historically used to get beaten up a lot about security vulnerabilities and Apple and their fanbois love to say that PCs get more viruses than Macs. Well, this report has some surprising results.</p>
<p>So, which vendor has the most security vulnerabilities?</p>
<p>Apple.</p>
<p>Yep, that's right, Apple. and they were in second place 2007-2009.</p>
<p>Oracle was in top place from 2007-2009 but&nbsp;got lea-frogged by Apple&nbsp;in 2010.</p>
<p>Microsoft is in 3rd place 2007+</p>
<p>The big mover and shaker in this chart?</p>
<p>Adobe.</p>
<p>Adobe didn't even feature until 2008 (10th place) and have jumped up to 5th place in 2 years.</p>
<p>The report makes for some interesting reading and should dispel a few urban myths.</p>
<p><a href="http://secunia.com/gfx/pdf/Secunia_Half_Year_Report_2010.pdf">http://secunia.com/gfx/pdf/Secunia_Half_Year_Report_2010.pdf</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Windows Live Essentials Beta now available</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/anthoben/windows-live-essentials-beta-now-available</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:54:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[AnthonyBennett]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/anthoben/2010/06/28/windows-live-essentials-beta-now-available/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Just an FYI that the new look Windows Live Essentials stuff (Windows Live Photo Gallery, Movie...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an FYI that the new look Windows Live Essentials stuff (Windows Live Photo Gallery, Movie Maker, Mail, Writer, Messenger and the new Live Sync)&nbsp;is available in public beta. I've been using it for many months now and highly recommend it. Just be aware that if you use Live Mesh this will remove it and replace with Live Sync. It also only works on Windows Vista and Windows 7; nothing for Windows XP.</p>
<p><strong>Windows Live Essentials beta<br /></strong><a href="http://explore.live.com/windows-live-essentials-beta"><strong>http://explore.live.com/windows-live-essentials-beta</strong></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>