<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="https://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="https://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="https://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="https://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="https://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
  version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Minutes on BI</title>
    <atom:link
      href="https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/feed.xml"
      rel="self"
      type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/feed.xml</link>
    <description>This is my Business Intelligence centric blog.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:47:49 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <item>
      <title>Zero Milli Seconds Disk Latentcy</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/zero-milli-seconds-disk-latentcy</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 02:18:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Lars Zimmermann]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/minutes_on_bi/2014/04/23/zero-milli-seconds-disk-latentcy/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Lately I done a performance lab where finding the limits of an existing SQL Server 2012 based...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately I done a performance lab where finding the limits of an existing SQL Server 2012 based application. The Test Lab was done with Team Foundation Server Test Suite on latest Hardware. SQL Server ran on HP DL 580 with 48Cores in 240GB RAM and Disk Subsystem was FusionIO 4TB Card.</p>
<p>The application itself was very Disk Intensive - storing excessively transactions in large tables and in addition large blobs in the database.</p>
<p>With all Load Agents running we came up to 50.000 SQL Batch Requests/Sec (monitored with Windows Perfmon) and during all the tests we never encountered a Disk latency greater than 0ms (Zero Milli-Seconds) whereas Processor Usage went up to 90-95% Processor Time.</p>
<p>These Results are very uncommon since multicore Systems have arrived and change the way we have to do performance tuning of Database Applications. Where usually we start by tuning queries that take about 200ms now we can start by tuning 50ms queries. And it becomes much more important to even tune queries that take about 5ms but occur very often.</p>
<p>The results change the way I think about performance tuning again. Where SSD Storage still has latency and is bottlenecked by Controllers performance (usually 780MB/s per channel) FusionIO seems to have no real limit that can be reached with this application. In addition the way the application makes use of SQL Server Features becomes much more important to tune even fast queries (&lt;5ms) becomes very important.</p>
<p><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:medium;">The next step to optimize applications is to go with SQL 2014 and use In Memory Optimized Tables. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:medium;">https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn133186(v=sql.120).aspx</span></p>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visual Studio Evolution 2013 – die Fachkonferenz zu Visual Studio und .NET</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/visual-studio-evolution-2013-die-fachkonferenz-zu-visual-studio-und-net</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 01:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Lars Zimmermann]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/minutes_on_bi/2013/10/09/visual-studio-evolution-2013-die-fachkonferenz-zu-visual-studio-und-net/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Visual Studio Evolution 2013 &ndash; die Fachkonferenz zu Visual Studio und .NET
&nbsp;
Nach dem...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visual Studio Evolution 2013 &ndash; die Fachkonferenz zu Visual Studio und .NET</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Nach dem Erscheinen von Visual<br />Studio 2012 und .NET Framework 4.5 im letzten Herbst, k&uuml;ndigen sich nun bereits<br />die beiden Nachfolgerversionen Visual Studio 2013 und .NET 4.5.1 an, die jede<br />Menge spannende Neuerungen mit sich bringen. Zusammen mit den M&ouml;glichkeiten von<br />Windows Phone, Windows Azure oder Windows 8 und Windows 8.1 bieten sich f&uuml;r<br />Entwickler viele interessante Optionen.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Aus diesem Grund veranstaltet<br />Microsoft Deutschand am <strong>14. Oktober</strong> die <a href="https://event-team.com/Events/vs-evolution-2013/"><strong>Visual<br />Studio Evolution 2013</strong></a>, eine<br />Fachkonferenz f&uuml;r Entwickler im Microsoft-Umfeld. In insgesamt <strong>vier Tracks,<br />drei Keynotes und 20 Sessions</strong> haben Sie die Chance, sich Informationen von <a href="https://event-team.com/Events/vs-evolution-2013/sprecher.aspx"><strong>Microsoft-Experten<br />und f&uuml;hrenden K&ouml;pfen aus der Community</strong></a><br />aus erster Hand zu holen.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In den vier Tracks <a href="https://event-team.com/Events/vs-evolution-2013/agenda.aspx"><strong>Visual<br />Studio, .NET Framework, Windows 8.1 &amp; Windows Phone und Web &amp; Cloud</strong></a><br />besch&auml;ftigen sich renommierte Sprecher wie Christian Binder, Neno Loje, Daniel<br />Meixner, Thomas Schissler oder Holger Sirtl unter anderem mit den folgenden<br />Themen: Was ist neu in Visual Studio 2013 und .NET Framework 4.5.1? Welche<br />M&ouml;glichkeiten bieten diese Neuerungen f&uuml;r klassische und neue Anwendungstypen?<br />Welchen Einfluss haben Apps und Cloud auf die Moderne Softwareentwicklung und<br />wie lassen sich die aktuellen Trends mit etablierten Technologien aus dem<br />.NET-Umfeld sinnvoll verbinden? Was f&uuml;r M&ouml;glichkeiten bieten Windows 8.1 und<br />Kinect?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>F&uuml;r die drei Keynotes reisen direkt<br />aus der Microsoft-Zentrale in Redmond Steve Fox, Director Modern Application<br />Center of Excellence, Ben Lower, Senior Program Manager Kinect for Windows, und<br />Habib Heydarian, GPM CLR Engineering Team, an.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Die Teilnahmegeb&uuml;hr f&uuml;r die<br />Fachkonferenz <strong>in Neuss bei D&uuml;sseldorf</strong> betr&auml;gt <strong>79 Euro</strong> (zzgl. 19<br />Prozent MwSt). Eine <a href="https://event-team.com/Events/vs-evolution-2013/registration.aspx"><strong>schnelle<br />Anmeldung</strong></a> wird empfohlen,<br />da die Teilnehmerzahl begrenzt ist.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ob Sie nun mit Visual Studio oder<br />dem .NET Framework arbeiten, Webentwickler sind, f&uuml;r mobile Endger&auml;te<br />entwickeln wollen oder Cloud Services in Ihre Anwendung einbinden, die Visual<br />Studio Evolution 2013 ist die richtige Anlaufstelle, um sich &uuml;ber aktuelle<br />Technologien, Programme und Services zu informieren. Nutzen Sie die Gelegenheit<br />und sichern Sie sich am besten noch heute Ihren Platz.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Performance Guidance for SQL Server in Windows Azure Virtual Machines</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/performance-guidance-for-sql-server-in-windows-azure-virtual-machines</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 17:41:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/minutes_on_bi/2013/05/31/performance-guidance-for-sql-server-in-windows-azure-virtual-machines/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Authors: Silvano Coriani, Jasraj Dange, Ewan Fairweather, Xin Jin, Alexei Khalyako, Sanjay Mishra,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Authors</strong>: Silvano Coriani, Jasraj Dange, Ewan Fairweather, Xin Jin, Alexei Khalyako, Sanjay Mishra, Selcin Turkarslan</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Technical Reviewers</strong>: Mark Russinovich, Brad Calder, Andrew Edwards, Suraj Puri, Flavio Muratore, Hanuma Kodavalla, Madhan Arumugam Ramakrishnan, Naveen Prakash, Robert Dorr, Roger Doherty, Steve Howard, Yorihito Tada, Kun Cheng, Chris Clayton, Igor Pagliai, Shep Sheppard, Tim Wieman, Greg Low, Juergen Thomas, Guy Bowerman, Evgeny Krivosheev</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Editor</strong>: Beth Inghram</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong></strong></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong></strong></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Summary</strong>: Developers and IT professionals should be fully knowledgeable about how to optimize the performance of SQL Server workloads running in Windows Azure Infrastructure Services and in more traditional on-premises environments. This technical article discusses the key factors to consider when evaluating performance and planning a migration to SQL Server in Windows Azure Virtual Machines. It also provides certain best practices and techniques for performance tuning and troubleshooting when using SQL Server in Windows Azure Infrastructure Services. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;">Read on: <a title="https://download.microsoft.com/download/D/2/0/D20E1C5F-72EA-4505-9F26-FEF9550EFD44/Performance%20Guidance%20for%20SQL%20Server%20in%20Windows%20Azure%20Virtual%20Machines.docx" href="https://sqlcat.com/controlpanel/blogs/posteditor.aspx/Performance%20Guidance%20for%20SQL%20Server%20in%20Windows%20Azure%20Virtual%20Machines" target="_blank">Performance Guidance for SQL Server in Windows Azure Virtual Machines</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"></span></p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="https://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2819" width="1" height="1"><img src="https://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/hNd9ZnAB-Mg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSIS Tips Tricks and Best Practices: SSIS Operational and Tuning Guide</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/ssis-tips-tricks-and-best-practices-ssis-operational-and-tuning-guide</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:39:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/minutes_on_bi/2013/01/02/ssis-tips-tricks-and-best-practices-ssis-operational-and-tuning-guide/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[SSIS Operational and Tuning Guide
SQL Server Technical Article
Writer: Alexei Khalyako, Carla...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt=" " src="https://i.msdn.microsoft.com/dynimg/IC596043.jpg" /></p>
<p></p>
<p><strong>SSIS Operational and Tuning Guide</strong></p>
<p>SQL Server Technical Article</p>
<p><strong>Writer:</strong> Alexei Khalyako, Carla Sabotta, Silvano Coriani, Sreedhar Pelluru, Steve Howard</p>
<p><strong>Technical Reviewer:</strong> Cindy Gross, David Pless, Mark Simms, Daniel Sol</p>
<p><strong>Published:</strong> December 2012</p>
<p><strong>Applies to:</strong> SQL Server 2012; Windows Azure SQL Database</p>
<p><strong>Summary:</strong> SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) can be used effectively as a tool for moving data to and from Windows Azure (WA) SQL Database, as part of the total extract, transform, and load (ETL) solution and as part of the data movement solution. SSIS can be used effectively to move data between sources and destinations in the cloud, and in a hybrid scenario between the cloud and on-premise. This paper outlines SSIS best practices for cloud sources and destinations, discusses project planning for SSIS projects whether the project is all in the cloud or involves hybrid data moves, and walks through an example of maximizing performance on a hybrid move by scaling out the data movement.</p>
<p></p>
<p>To review the document, please download the <a href="https://download.microsoft.com/download/D/2/0/D20E1C5F-72EA-4505-9F26-FEF9550EFD44/SSIS%20Operational%20and%20Tuning%20Guide.docx">SSIS Operational and Tuning Guide</a> Word document.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="https://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2778" width="1" height="1"><img src="https://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/gpcdt8YTdTw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSIS Tips Tricks and Best Practices: SSIS for Azure and Hybrid Data Movement</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/ssis-tips-tricks-and-best-practices-ssis-for-azure-and-hybrid-data-movement</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/minutes_on_bi/2013/01/02/ssis-tips-tricks-and-best-practices-ssis-for-azure-and-hybrid-data-movement/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[SSIS for Azure and Hybrid Data Movement
SQL Server Technical Article
Writer: Alexei Khalyako,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt=" " src="https://i.msdn.microsoft.com/dynimg/IC596043.jpg" /></p>
<p></p>
<p><strong>SSIS for Azure and Hybrid Data Movement</strong></p>
<p>SQL Server Technical Article</p>
<p><strong>Writer:</strong> Alexei Khalyako, Carla Sabotta, Daniel Sol, Silvano Coriani, Sreedhar Pelluru, Steve Howard</p>
<p><strong>Technical Reviewer:</strong> David Pless</p>
<p><strong>Published:</strong> December 2012</p>
<p><strong>Applies to:</strong> SQL Server 2012</p>
<p><strong>Summary:</strong> SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) can be used effectively as a tool for moving data to and from Windows Azure SQL Database, as part of the total extract, transform, and load (ETL) solution and as part of the data movement solution. SSIS can be used effectively to move data between sources and destinations in the cloud, and in a hybrid scenario between the cloud and on-premise. This paper outlines best practices for using SSIS for cloud sources and destinations and for project planning for SSIS projects to be used with Azure or hybrid data moves, and gives an example of maximizing performance on a hybrid move by scaling out the data movement.</p>
<p></p>
<p>To review the document, please download the <a href="https://download.microsoft.com/download/D/2/0/D20E1C5F-72EA-4505-9F26-FEF9550EFD44/SSIS%20Hybrid%20and%20Azure.docx">SSIS for Azure and Hybrid Data Movement</a> Word document.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="https://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2777" width="1" height="1"><img src="https://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/B3gKyfae8II" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AlwaysOn Architecture Guide: Building a High Availability and Disaster Recovery Solution by Using Failover Cluster Instances and Availability Groups</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/alwayson-architecture-guide-building-a-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-solution-by-using-failover-cluster-instances-and-availability-groups</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/minutes_on_bi/2012/06/22/alwayson-architecture-guide-building-a-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-solution-by-using-failover-cluster-instances-and-availability-groups/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Authors: Joseph Sack (SQLskills.com), Sanjay Mishra (Microsoft)
Technical Reviewers: Min He...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Authors:</strong> Joseph Sack (SQLskills.com), Sanjay Mishra (Microsoft)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Technical Reviewers:</strong> Min He (Microsoft), Chuck Heinzelman (Microsoft), Alexi Khalyako (Microsoft), Charles Mathews (Microsoft), Prem Mehra (Microsoft) , Juergen Thomas (Microsoft), Mike Weiner (Microsoft), Amitabh Tamhane (Microsoft), Brent Ozar (Brent Ozar PLF), Gianluca Hotz (SolidQ), David P. Smith (ServiceU), Michael Steineke (Edgenet), Glenn Berry (SQLskills.com)</span></p>
<p><strong>Content Program Manager</strong>: Glenn Minch (Microsoft)</p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Summary:</strong> SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn Failover Cluster Instances (FCI) and AlwaysOn Availability Groups provide a comprehensive high availability and disaster recovery solution. Prior to SQL Server 2012, many customers used FCIs to provide local high availability within a data center and database mirroring for disaster recovery to a remote data center. With SQL Server 2012, this design pattern can be replaced with an architecture that uses FCIs for high availability and availability groups for disaster recovery business requirements. Availability groups leverage Windows Server Failover Clustering (WSFC) functionality and enable multiple features not available in database mirroring. This paper details the key topology requirements of this specific design pattern, including asymmetric storage considerations, quorum model selection, quorum votes, steps required to build the environment, and a workflow illustrating how to handle a disaster recovery event in the new topology across participating job roles.</span></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Read on:<a href="https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj215886">https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj215886</a></strong></span></p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="https://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2712" width="1" height="1"><img src="https://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/MX_VHWgHisU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AlwaysOn Architecture Guide: Building a High Availability and Disaster Recovery Solution by Using AlwaysOn Availability Groups</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/alwayson-architecture-guide-building-a-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-solution-by-using-alwayson-availability-groups</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/minutes_on_bi/2012/06/22/alwayson-architecture-guide-building-a-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-solution-by-using-alwayson-availability-groups/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Authors: Joseph Sack (SQLskills.com), Sanjay Mishra (Microsoft)
Technical Reviewers: Lindsey Allen...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Authors:</strong> Joseph Sack (SQLskills.com), Sanjay Mishra (Microsoft)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Technical Reviewers:</strong> Lindsey Allen (MS), Juergen Thomas (MS), Mike Weiner (MS), Prem Mehra (MS), Yorihito Tada (MS), Curt Matthews (MS), Amitabh Tamhane (MS), Aditya Samant (MS), Daniel Janik (MS), Jimmy May (MS), David P Smith (ServiceU), Richard Waymire (SolidQ), Brent Ozar (Brent Ozar PLF), Wolfgang Kutschera (bwin.party), Paul S. Randal (SQLskills.com), Gianluca Hotz (SolidQ), Ayad Shammout (Caregroup)</span></p>
<p><strong>Content Program Manager</strong>: Glenn Minch (Microsoft)</p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Summary: </strong>SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn Availability Groups provides a unified high availability and disaster recovery (HADR) solution that improves upon legacy functionality previously found across disparate features. Prior to SQL Server 2012, several customers used database mirroring to provide local high availability within a data center, and log shipping for disaster recovery across a remote data center. With SQL Server 2012, this common design pattern can be replaced with an architecture that uses availability groups for both high availability and disaster recovery. This paper details the key topology requirements of this specific design pattern, including quorum configuration considerations, steps required to build the environment, and a workflow that shows how to handle a disaster recovery event in the new topology.</span></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Read on: <a href="https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj191711">https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj191711</a></strong></span></p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="https://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2711" width="1" height="1"><img src="https://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/VIHAJPvZSRs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Migration Guide: Migrating to SQL Server 2012 Failover Clustering and Availability Groups from Prior Clustering and Mirroring Deployments</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/migration-guide-migrating-to-sql-server-2012-failover-clustering-and-availability-groups-from-prior-clustering-and-mirroring-deployments</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/minutes_on_bi/2012/04/04/migration-guide-migrating-to-sql-server-2012-failover-clustering-and-availability-groups-from-prior-clustering-and-mirroring-deployments/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Writer: Cephas Lin (Microsoft) 
Contributors: Sanjay Mishra (Microsoft), David Smith (ServiceU...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Writer:</strong> Cephas Lin (Microsoft) </p>
<p><strong>Contributors:</strong> Sanjay Mishra (Microsoft), David Smith (ServiceU Corporation), LeRoy Tuttle Jr. (Microsoft)</p>
<p><strong>Technical Reviewers:</strong> Prem Mehra (Microsoft), Mike Weiner (Microsoft), Steve Howard (Microsoft), Kun Cheng (Microsoft)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Summary:&nbsp;</strong>Using Failover Cluster Instance (FCI) for local high availability within a data center and augmenting it with Database Mirroring (DBM) for disaster recovery has been a very popular HA+DR solution. With SQL Server 2012, this FCI+DBM solution can be replaced with a FCI+AG (Availability Groups) solution. This whitepaper describes how to migrate an existing FCI+DBM solution to a FCI+AG solution.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Read on: <a href="https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh923056.aspx">https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh923056.aspx</a></strong></p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="https://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2667" width="1" height="1"><img src="https://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/9Ks7EE1se1g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft SQL Server AlwaysOn Solutions Guide for High Availability and Disaster Recovery</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/microsoft-sql-server-alwayson-solutions-guide-for-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/minutes_on_bi/2012/02/25/microsoft-sql-server-alwayson-solutions-guide-for-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Writer: LeRoy Tuttle, Jr. (Microsoft). 
Contributors: Cephas Lin (Microsoft), Justin Erickson...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Writer:</strong> LeRoy Tuttle, Jr. (Microsoft). </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Contributors:</strong> Cephas Lin (Microsoft), Justin Erickson (Microsoft), Lindsey Allen (Microsoft), Min He (Microsoft), Sanjay Mishra (Microsoft).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Reviewers:</strong> Alexei Khalyako (Microsoft), Allan Hirt (SQLHA), Ayad Shammout (Caregroup), Benjamin Wright-Jones (Microsoft), Charles Matthews (Microsoft), David P. Smith (ServiceU), Juergen Thomas (Microsoft), Kevin Farlee (Microsoft), Shahryar G. Hashemi (Motricity), Wolfgang Kutschera (Bwin Party).</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>Summary: </strong>This white paper discusses how to reduce planned and unplanned downtime, maximize application availability, and provide data protection using SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn high availability and disaster recovery solutions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;">A key goal of this paper is to establish a common context for related discussions between business stakeholders, technical decision makers, system architects, infrastructure engineers, and database administrators.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;">The content is presented in two major parts:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>High Availability and Disaster Recovery Concepts.</strong> Provide a brief discussion of the drivers and challenges of planning, managing, and measuring the business objectives of a highly available database environment. This discussion is followed by a brief overview of the high availability and disaster recovery capabilities of SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn and Windows Server solutions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>SQL Server AlwaysOn Layers of Protection.</strong> Provide a deeper discussion of the feature capabilities, rationale, and dependencies of the layers of protection offered by a SQL Server AlwaysOn solution. It will cover infrastructure availability, SQL Server instance-level protection, database-level protection, and data tier application capabilities.<span id="mce_marker">&nbsp;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:&#39;Segoe UI&#39;,&#39;sans-serif&#39;;color:black;font-size:small;"><strong>Read on: <a href="https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh781257.aspx">https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh781257.aspx</a></strong></span></p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="https://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2646" width="1" height="1"><img src="https://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/KLlLmrfvZ18" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn: Multisite Failover Cluster Instance</title>
      <link>https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/minutes_on_bi/sql-server-2012-alwayson-multisite-failover-cluster-instance</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
      <guid
        isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/minutes_on_bi/2011/12/22/sql-server-2012-alwayson-multisite-failover-cluster-instance/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Writers: Mike Weiner, Sanjay Mishra, Min He
Contributors: Lingwei Li, Mike Anderson (EMC...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Writers:</b> Mike Weiner, Sanjay Mishra, Min He</p>
<p><b>Contributors:</b> Lingwei Li, Mike Anderson (EMC Corporation)<b></b></p>
<p><b>Technical Reviewers:</b> Shaun Tinline-Jones, Steve Howard, Prem Mehra, Paul Burpo, Mike Ruthruff, Jimmy May, Matt Neerincx, Dan Benediktson, Michael Steineke (Edgenet Inc.), David P. Smith (ServiceU Corporation)<b></b></p>
<p><b>Applies to:</b> SQL Server 2012</p>
<p><b>Summary:</b> SQL Server Failover Clustering, which includes support for both local and multisite failover configurations, is part of the SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn implementation suite, designed to provide high availability and disaster recovery for SQL Server. The multisite failover clustering technology has been enhanced significantly in SQL Server 2012. The multisite failover cluster architecture, enhancements in SQL Server 2012 to the technology, and some best practices to help with deployment of the technology are the primary focus of this paper.</p>
<p>You can download the complete document here: <a href="https://download.microsoft.com/download/D/2/0/D20E1C5F-72EA-4505-9F26-FEF9550EFD44/SQLServer2012_MultisiteFailoverCluster%20(2).docx">https://download.microsoft.com/download/D/2/0/D20E1C5F-72EA-4505-9F26-FEF9550EFD44/SQLServer2012_MultisiteFailoverCluster%20(2).docx</a></p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="https://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2615" width="1" height="1"><img src="https://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/xTjmpVQryPM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>