Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance controls for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Regulatory Compliance in Azure Policy provides initiative definitions (built-ins) created and managed by Microsoft, for the compliance domains and security controls related to different compliance standards. This page lists the Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) compliance domains and security controls.
You can assign the built-ins for a security control individually to help make your Azure resources compliant with the specific standard.
The title of each built-in policy definition links to the policy definition in the Azure portal. Use the link in the Policy Version column to view the source on the Azure Policy GitHub repo.
Important
Each control is associated with one or more Azure Policy definitions. These policies might help you assess compliance with the control. However, there often isn't a one-to-one or complete match between a control and one or more policies. As such, Compliant in Azure Policy refers only to the policies themselves. This doesn't ensure that you're fully compliant with all requirements of a control. In addition, the compliance standard includes controls that aren't addressed by any Azure Policy definitions at this time. Therefore, compliance in Azure Policy is only a partial view of your overall compliance status. The associations between controls and Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance definitions for these compliance standards can change over time.
Azure Security Benchmark
The Azure Security Benchmark provides recommendations on how you can secure your cloud solutions on Azure. To see how this service completely maps to the Azure Security Benchmark, see the Azure Security Benchmark mapping files.
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - Azure Security Benchmark.
Domain | Control ID | Control title | Policy (Azure portal) |
Policy version (GitHub) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Network Security | NS-2 | Secure cloud services with network controls | Authorized IP ranges should be defined on Kubernetes Services | 2.0.1 |
Privileged Access | PA-7 | Follow just enough administration (least privilege) principle | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
Data Protection | DP-3 | Encrypt sensitive data in transit | Kubernetes clusters should be accessible only over HTTPS | 8.0.1 |
Logging and Threat Detection | LT-1 | Enable threat detection capabilities | Azure Kubernetes Service clusters should have Defender profile enabled | 2.0.0 |
Logging and Threat Detection | LT-2 | Enable threat detection for identity and access management | Azure Kubernetes Service clusters should have Defender profile enabled | 2.0.0 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | [Preview]: Kubernetes clusters should gate deployment of vulnerable images | 2.0.1-preview |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Azure Policy Add-on for Kubernetes service (AKS) should be installed and enabled on your clusters | 1.0.2 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes cluster containers CPU and memory resource limits should not exceed the specified limits | 9.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes cluster containers should not share host process ID or host IPC namespace | 5.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes cluster containers should only use allowed AppArmor profiles | 6.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes cluster containers should only use allowed capabilities | 6.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes cluster containers should only use allowed images | 9.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes cluster containers should run with a read only root file system | 6.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes cluster pod hostPath volumes should only use allowed host paths | 6.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes cluster pods and containers should only run with approved user and group IDs | 6.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes cluster pods should only use approved host network and port range | 6.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes cluster services should listen only on allowed ports | 8.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes cluster should not allow privileged containers | 9.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes clusters should disable automounting API credentials | 4.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes clusters should not allow container privilege escalation | 7.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes clusters should not grant CAP_SYS_ADMIN security capabilities | 5.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-2 | Audit and enforce secure configurations | Kubernetes clusters should not use the default namespace | 4.0.1 |
Posture and Vulnerability Management | PV-6 | Rapidly and automatically remediate vulnerabilities | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 |
DevOps Security | DS-6 | Enforce security of workload throughout DevOps lifecycle | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 |
Azure Security Benchmark v1
The Azure Security Benchmark provides recommendations on how you can secure your cloud solutions on Azure. To see how this service completely maps to the Azure Security Benchmark, see the Azure Security Benchmark mapping files.
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - Azure Security Benchmark.
Domain | Control ID | Control title | Policy (Azure portal) |
Policy version (GitHub) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Network Security | 1.1 | Protect resources using Network Security Groups or Azure Firewall on your Virtual Network | Authorized IP ranges should be defined on Kubernetes Services | 2.0.1 |
Data Protection | 4.6 | Use Azure RBAC to control access to resources | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
Vulnerability Management | 5.3 | Deploy automated third-party software patch management solution | Kubernetes Services should be upgraded to a non-vulnerable Kubernetes version | 1.0.2 |
CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark 1.1.0
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark 1.1.0. For more information about this compliance standard, see CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark.
Domain | Control ID | Control title | Policy (Azure portal) |
Policy version (GitHub) |
---|---|---|---|---|
8 Other Security Considerations | CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark recommendation 8.5 | Enable role-based access control (RBAC) within Azure Kubernetes Services | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark 1.3.0
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark 1.3.0. For more information about this compliance standard, see CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark.
Domain | Control ID | Control title | Policy (Azure portal) |
Policy version (GitHub) |
---|---|---|---|---|
8 Other Security Considerations | CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark recommendation 8.5 | Enable role-based access control (RBAC) within Azure Kubernetes Services | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark 1.4.0
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance details for CIS v1.4.0. For more information about this compliance standard, see CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark.
Domain | Control ID | Control title | Policy (Azure portal) |
Policy version (GitHub) |
---|---|---|---|---|
8 Other Security Considerations | CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark recommendation 8.7 | Enable role-based access control (RBAC) within Azure Kubernetes Services | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
CMMC Level 3
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - CMMC Level 3. For more information about this compliance standard, see Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC).
Domain | Control ID | Control title | Policy (Azure portal) |
Policy version (GitHub) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Access Control | AC.1.001 | Limit information system access to authorized users, processes acting on behalf of authorized users, and devices (including other information systems). | Kubernetes cluster pods should only use approved host network and port range | 6.0.1 |
Access Control | AC.1.001 | Limit information system access to authorized users, processes acting on behalf of authorized users, and devices (including other information systems). | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
Access Control | AC.1.002 | Limit information system access to the types of transactions and functions that authorized users are permitted to execute. | Kubernetes cluster pods should only use approved host network and port range | 6.0.1 |
Access Control | AC.1.002 | Limit information system access to the types of transactions and functions that authorized users are permitted to execute. | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
Access Control | AC.2.007 | Employ the principle of least privilege, including for specific security functions and privileged accounts. | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
Access Control | AC.2.016 | Control the flow of CUI in accordance with approved authorizations. | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
Configuration Management | CM.2.062 | Employ the principle of least functionality by configuring organizational systems to provide only essential capabilities. | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
Configuration Management | CM.3.068 | Restrict, disable, or prevent the use of nonessential programs, functions, ports, protocols, and services. | Kubernetes cluster pods should only use approved host network and port range | 6.0.1 |
Risk Assessment | RM.2.143 | Remediate vulnerabilities in accordance with risk assessments. | Kubernetes Services should be upgraded to a non-vulnerable Kubernetes version | 1.0.2 |
System and Communications Protection | SC.1.175 | Monitor, control, and protect communications (i.e., information transmitted or received by organizational systems) at the external boundaries and key internal boundaries of organizational systems. | Kubernetes cluster pods should only use approved host network and port range | 6.0.1 |
System and Communications Protection | SC.3.177 | Employ FIPS-validated cryptography when used to protect the confidentiality of CUI. | Both operating systems and data disks in Azure Kubernetes Service clusters should be encrypted by customer-managed keys | 1.0.1 |
System and Communications Protection | SC.3.183 | Deny network communications traffic by default and allow network communications traffic by exception (i.e., deny all, permit by exception). | Kubernetes cluster pods should only use approved host network and port range | 6.0.1 |
System and Information Integrity | SI.1.210 | Identify, report, and correct information and information system flaws in a timely manner. | Kubernetes Services should be upgraded to a non-vulnerable Kubernetes version | 1.0.2 |
FedRAMP High
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - FedRAMP High. For more information about this compliance standard, see FedRAMP High.
FedRAMP Moderate
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - FedRAMP Moderate. For more information about this compliance standard, see FedRAMP Moderate.
HIPAA HITRUST 9.2
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - HIPAA HITRUST 9.2. For more information about this compliance standard, see HIPAA HITRUST 9.2.
Domain | Control ID | Control title | Policy (Azure portal) |
Policy version (GitHub) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Privilege Management | 1149.01c2System.9 - 01.c | The organization facilitates information sharing by enabling authorized users to determine a business partner's access when discretion is allowed as defined by the organization and by employing manual processes or automated mechanisms to assist users in making information sharing/collaboration decisions. | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
11 Access Control | 1153.01c3System.35-01.c | 1153.01c3System.35-01.c 01.02 Authorized Access to Information Systems | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
12 Audit Logging & Monitoring | 1229.09c1Organizational.1-09.c | 1229.09c1Organizational.1-09.c 09.01 Documented Operating Procedures | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5. For more information about this compliance standard, see NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5.
NZ ISM Restricted v3.5
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - NZ ISM Restricted v3.5. For more information about this compliance standard, see NZ ISM Restricted v3.5.
Domain | Control ID | Control title | Policy (Azure portal) |
Policy version (GitHub) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Access Control and Passwords | NZISM Security Benchmark AC-18 | 16.6.9 Events to be logged | Resource logs in Azure Kubernetes Service should be enabled | 1.0.0 |
Gateway security | NZISM Security Benchmark GS-2 | 19.1.11 Using Gateways | Authorized IP ranges should be defined on Kubernetes Services | 2.0.1 |
Infrastructure | NZISM Security Benchmark INF-9 | 10.8.35 Security Architecture | Azure Policy Add-on for Kubernetes service (AKS) should be installed and enabled on your clusters | 1.0.2 |
Infrastructure | NZISM Security Benchmark INF-9 | 10.8.35 Security Architecture | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
Software security | NZISM Security Benchmark SS-3 | 14.1.9 Maintaining hardened SOEs | Kubernetes cluster containers should not share host process ID or host IPC namespace | 5.0.1 |
Software security | NZISM Security Benchmark SS-3 | 14.1.9 Maintaining hardened SOEs | Kubernetes cluster containers should run with a read only root file system | 6.0.1 |
Software security | NZISM Security Benchmark SS-3 | 14.1.9 Maintaining hardened SOEs | Kubernetes cluster should not allow privileged containers | 9.0.1 |
Software security | NZISM Security Benchmark SS-3 | 14.1.9 Maintaining hardened SOEs | Kubernetes clusters should be accessible only over HTTPS | 8.0.1 |
Software security | NZISM Security Benchmark SS-3 | 14.1.9 Maintaining hardened SOEs | Kubernetes clusters should disable automounting API credentials | 4.0.1 |
Software security | NZISM Security Benchmark SS-3 | 14.1.9 Maintaining hardened SOEs | Kubernetes clusters should not allow container privilege escalation | 7.0.1 |
Software security | NZISM Security Benchmark SS-3 | 14.1.9 Maintaining hardened SOEs | Kubernetes clusters should not grant CAP_SYS_ADMIN security capabilities | 5.0.1 |
Software security | NZISM Security Benchmark SS-3 | 14.1.9 Maintaining hardened SOEs | Kubernetes clusters should not use the default namespace | 4.0.1 |
Reserve Bank of India - IT Framework for NBFC
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - Reserve Bank of India - IT Framework for NBFC. For more information about this compliance standard, see Reserve Bank of India - IT Framework for NBFC.
Domain | Control ID | Control title | Policy (Azure portal) |
Policy version (GitHub) |
---|---|---|---|---|
IT Governance | RBI IT Framework 1 | IT Governance-1 | Kubernetes Services should be upgraded to a non-vulnerable Kubernetes version | 1.0.2 |
Information and Cyber Security | RBI IT Framework 3.1.a | Identification and Classification of Information Assets-3.1 | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
Information and Cyber Security | RBI IT Framework 3.1.c | Role based Access Control-3.1 | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 |
Information and Cyber Security | RBI IT Framework 3.1.g | Trails-3.1 | Azure Kubernetes Service clusters should have Defender profile enabled | 2.0.0 |
Information and Cyber Security | RBI IT Framework 3.3 | Vulnerability Management-3.3 | Kubernetes Services should be upgraded to a non-vulnerable Kubernetes version | 1.0.2 |
Information and Cyber Security | RBI IT Framework 3.3 | Vulnerability Management-3.3 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 |
Reserve Bank of India IT Framework for Banks v2016
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - RBI ITF Banks v2016. For more information about this compliance standard, see RBI ITF Banks v2016 (PDF).
Domain | Control ID | Control title | Policy (Azure portal) |
Policy version (GitHub) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management | Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management-7.7 | Authorized IP ranges should be defined on Kubernetes Services | 2.0.1 | |
Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management | Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management-7.7 | Authorized IP ranges should be defined on Kubernetes Services | 2.0.1 | |
Anti-Phishing | Anti-Phishing-14.1 | Authorized IP ranges should be defined on Kubernetes Services | 2.0.1 | |
Advanced Real-Timethreat Defenceand Management | Advanced Real-Timethreat Defenceand Management-13.2 | Azure Kubernetes Service clusters should have Defender profile enabled | 2.0.0 | |
User Access Control / Management | User Access Control / Management-8.5 | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 | |
User Access Control / Management | User Access Control / Management-8.1 | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 | |
User Access Control / Management | User Access Control / Management-8.8 | Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used on Kubernetes Services | 1.0.2 | |
Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc) | Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc)-6.3 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc) | Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc)-6.1 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc) | Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc)-6.7 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc) | Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc)-6.6 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc) | Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc)-6.3 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc) | Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc)-6.1 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Preventing Execution Of Unauthorised Software | Security Update Management-2.3 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management | Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management-7.6 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management | Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management-7.2 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management | Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management-7.1 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management | Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management-7.6 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management | Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management-7.2 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management | Patch/Vulnerability & Change Management-7.1 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc) | Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc)-6.6 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 | |
Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc) | Application Security Life Cycle (Aslc)-6.7 | Running container images should have vulnerability findings resolved | 1.0.1 |
RMIT Malaysia
To review how the available Azure Policy built-ins for all Azure services map to this compliance standard, see Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance - RMIT Malaysia. For more information about this compliance standard, see RMIT Malaysia.
Next steps
- Learn more about Azure Policy Regulatory Compliance.
- See the built-ins on the Azure Policy GitHub repo.
Feedback
Submit and view feedback for