Can we use Citrix UPM for profile container and FSLogix for office container in same environment for CItrix VDI?

Shivani, Shivani 1 Reputation point
2022-09-24T04:53:44.897+00:00

> We have existing Citrix VDI (Pool servers) which are using Citrix UPM for Profile management.

For Setting up OneDrive for sync at the same server, we found that FSLogix office container to be setup on same.

Can we use Citrix UPM for profile container and FSLogix for office container in same environment for Citrix VDI? Or we have to replace Citrix UPM profile container with FS Logix Profile container?

Windows
Windows
A family of Microsoft operating systems that run across personal computers, tablets, laptops, phones, internet of things devices, self-contained mixed reality headsets, large collaboration screens, and other devices.
4,778 questions
FSLogix
FSLogix
A set of solutions that enhance, enable, and simplify non-persistent Windows computing environments and may also be used to create more portable computing sessions when using physical devices.
463 questions

1 answer

Sort by: Most helpful
Most helpful Newest Oldest
  1. Limitless Technology 43,966 Reputation points
    2022-09-28T08:01:58.43+00:00

    Hello ShivaniShivani

    Yes, both can coexist with the proper redirection XML for FSLogix. I can recommend also to consult in a Citrix Forum as their community may be better experienced on how to configure the redirection and also to configure the same as exception for Citrix UPM.

    All in all the redirection-XML should look like (example for folders AppData\Roaming\Google\ and AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Office) :

    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <FrxProfileFolderRedirection ExcludeCommonFolders="255">
    <Includes>
    <Include>AppData\Roaming\Google\</Include>
    <Include>AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Office\</Include>
    </Includes>
    <Excludes />
    </FrxProfileFolderRedirection>

    Reference: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fslogix/manage-profile-content-cncpt

    --If the reply is helpful, please Upvote and Accept as answer--

    0 comments