@Sander Walraven - I expect you've moved on from this since it's been a year, but I thought I'd leave a comment since I had the same questions and I expect others may as well.
While I can't find documentation to confirm this, I think the MAX value is returning the maximum block-size sent or received over the time interval. Overall, the ingress and egress graphs are showing an aggregation of blocks transferred over an interval. When the block-sizes are SUMed, that then provides a total amount of data transferred over the interval, which certainly is meaningful.
This would be the reason then that the MAX aggregation tends to "flatline", often around 1MiB, and why the units on that graph are simply MiB (and not MiB / sec as it would be to show a data rate).
To us, the MAX aggregation doesn't seem to be particularly useful for performance monitoring (and I think it can be easily misinterpreted), though it may be valuable for diagnostic purposes such as to see if SMB is configured with the right block size to give best performance.