6281 Event failure

Spellbound vfx 6 Reputation points
2021-04-03T04:30:10.893+00:00

In our network, we are receiving constant event failures in this category. Can somebody explain what may be the reason?

Event 6281 occurred at 02-04-2021 10:07:16.

Date Time: 02-04-2021 10:07:16
Event Source: Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing
Event Category: 12290
Event Type: Information
Event ID: 6281
Event Log Name: HardwareEvents
User: N/A
Computer: xxxxxx
Description:
Code Integrity determined that the page hashes of an image file are not valid. The file could be improperly signed without page hashes or corrupt due to unauthorized modification. The invalid hashes could indicate a potential disk device error.

File Name: \Device\HarddiskVolume3\Windows\System32\aepic.dll
Event Parameters:
\Device\HarddiskVolume3\Windows\System32\aepic.dll
%String2%

%String3%

Report generated on: xxxxxxx

Windows 10 Security
Windows 10 Security
Windows 10: A Microsoft operating system that runs on personal computers and tablets.Security: The precautions taken to guard against crime, attack, sabotage, espionage, or another threat.
2,754 questions
{count} votes

2 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. S.Sengupta 15,111 Reputation points MVP
    2021-04-04T11:59:03.83+00:00
    0 comments No comments

  2. Gary Nebbett 5,721 Reputation points
    2021-04-05T12:56:40.72+00:00

    Hello @Spellbound vfx ,

    You mention "event failures in this category" - does this imply that the file name in the events that you have seen differ?

    If the file name is always aepic.dll or a small set of file names, it might be worth investigating what is wrong with the file(s) and how the damage may have happened. The SDK tool "signtool" can be used to examine the problem in more detail (e.g. signtool verify /a /v /ph /debug \Windows\System32\aepic.dll). If you can make the file available here (via a OneDrive, Google Drive, etc. link) then we can check it and try to determine if a targeted modification has been applied to the file.

    If the filenames vary wildly, then the problem is more likely to be related to checking the certificate chains used in signing/timestamping.

    Gary

    0 comments No comments