Hinweis
Für den Zugriff auf diese Seite ist eine Autorisierung erforderlich. Sie können versuchen, sich anzumelden oder das Verzeichnis zu wechseln.
Für den Zugriff auf diese Seite ist eine Autorisierung erforderlich. Sie können versuchen, das Verzeichnis zu wechseln.
Since I raised the subject I've had a mail from a couple of people on the subject of making a bootable key.
I described the steps making a USB key bootable using the Vista / Windows PE version of Diskpart. Here are the commands
- select disk 1 {or the number of your USB key, be careful !}
- clean {Like I said, be careful ! This erases the disk}
- create partition primary
- select partition 1
- active
- format fs=fat32
- assign
- exit
Now at this point you have a disk which will try to boot using BootMgr in the style of Windows PE/Vista/Longhorn server. Several people have asked about making a key which boots in the style of Server 2003/XP/Windows 2000/Windows NT. I can't make the Vista/PE version of disk part run on Windows XP, and the older version won't prepare a USB key. So you need to do this from Vista or the Vista build of Windows PE. Once the drive is formatted it has a Vista Boot sector - this won't boot NT / 200x / XP operating systems. You need to use the BootSect utility:
Boosect /nt52 E:
stamps a Window 2003 Server boot sector (one which uses boot.ini) onto drive E:. I haven't tried it but you should be able copy NTLDR, BOOT.INI and NTDETECT.COM onto a USB key as a way of starting a machine which with a corrupt boot environment.
For now, as far as I can tell, there's no way to set-up such a device under XP/Server 2003. I'd welcome any correction on this.
Technorati tags: Microsoft, Windows, vista, deployment
Comments
Anonymous
January 01, 2003
I am installing Windows Server 2008 on a new server that has no video card and no DVD drive. It's anAnonymous
January 01, 2003
Hopefully the title is self evident. The servers are taking a real pasting right now, so you might findAnonymous
January 01, 2003
I like 64 bit vista. It's proved be excellent at performance, reliability and application compatibilityAnonymous
January 02, 2007
The comment has been removed