Αυτό το πρόγραμμα περιήγησης δεν υποστηρίζεται πλέον.
Κάντε αναβάθμιση σε Microsoft Edge για να επωφεληθείτε από τις τελευταίες δυνατότητες, τις ενημερώσεις ασφαλείας και την τεχνική υποστήριξη.
A legal team is reviewing content in a case and wants to maintain a consistent, auditable record of data added for analysis. Why would they use a review set in Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?
To automatically delete irrelevant items from search results.
To store a static set of content for focused review and tagging.
To merge results from multiple cases into one shared location.
You're analyzing a large volume of email data in a review set. What's the benefit of running analytics before starting manual review?
It permanently deletes duplicate files to reduce storage costs.
It sorts documents by file extension to simplify viewing.
It reduces review volume by grouping near-duplicates and identifying key emails.
You're reviewing tagged documents in a case and want to apply a consistent tagging structure across future cases. What should you do?
Save the tag list as a local file and manually recreate it later.
Import a predefined tag template created by an eDiscovery administrator.
Convert the tags into a filter to export only tagged items.
A case reviewer is using the filter panel in a review set to identify documents that are missing tags. What condition should they use?
Tag field with the 'Is empty' operator.
File type filter with the 'Isn't empty' operator.
Search filter with the 'Equals' operator set to 'None'.
Your team is preparing for export but wants to include all related items such as attachments and chat messages. Which export option should you enable?
Export text files
Include associated family and conversation items
Enable redaction before export
You must answer all questions before checking your work.
Ήταν χρήσιμη αυτή η σελίδα;
Χρειάζεστε βοήθεια σχετικά με αυτό το θέμα;
Θέλετε να δοκιμάσετε να χρησιμοποιήσετε την επιλογή Ρωτήστε το Learn για να σας καθοδηγήσει σε αυτό το θέμα;