Hi Derek Morgan II,
Thank you for posting in the Q&A Forums.
We need to clarify a few key points:
Active Directory (AD) does have some design limitations, including the number of objects, the number of security identifiers, the size of access control lists, the group membership of security subjects, and the length of FQDNs. However, specifically with regard to cross forest manager settings, AD does not explicitly prohibit setting a user object in one forest to the manager attribute of a user object in another forest.
However, in practice, due to the complexity of AD's security model and trust relationships, setting the manager attribute directly across forests may encounter some difficulties.
In AD, if a two-way trust relationship exists between two forests, then theoretically user objects in these two forests should be able to access and recognize resources in each other's forests. However, this does not mean that user attributes in the other forest can be modified without restriction.
Two-way trust is mainly used for authentication and authorization, not directly for modifying user attributes.
Best regards
NeuviJ
============================================
If the Answer is helpful, please click "Accept Answer" and upvote it.