Share via

Reactive Extensions v1.0 Stable and v1.1 Experimental available now!

  • Article

We're happy to announce the first official releases of Reactive Extensions v1.0 Stable and v1.1 Experimental:

More information will be available on Channel 9 and the Rx forums. Also check out the Rx homepage on MSDN Data Developer Center.

Together with the release of Rx v1.0 RTW and Rx v1.1 Experimental, we've brought back the Interactive Extensions (Ix) v1.1 Experimental:

Thanks for the continuous feedback we received over the last few years, building and growing Rx to what it has become today.

Comments

  • Anonymous
    June 29, 2011
    What  is the equivalent of MutableDisposable(AssignmentBehavior.ReplaceAndDisposePrevious) in the final release? Is it MultipleAssignmentDisposable ?

  • Anonymous
    June 30, 2011
    What happened to the IEvent<TEventArgs> ?!

  • Anonymous
    June 30, 2011
    @bankoh - Check out SerialDisposable.

  • Anonymous
    June 30, 2011
    @Rx Enthusiast - There turned out be only one implementation of the interface, basically with "smart fields" aka properties and it was hard to imagine other types that'd implement it. So we swapped it out by a concrete EventPattern<TEventArgs> type instead.

  • Anonymous
    July 01, 2011
    Awesome! An official v1.0 product release. Very nice, guys! Rx is a powerful framework; more people need to know about this.

  • Anonymous
    July 05, 2011
    I see that FastSubject<T> is now Subject<T>. What happened to the old implementation of Subject<T> where I could provide a scheduler? Am I supposed to use a ReplaySubject<T> of size 0?

  • Anonymous
    July 05, 2011
    Try this: var s = Subject.Synchronize(new Subject<T>(), scheduler);

  • Anonymous
    July 05, 2011
    What is the difference of this release and the Rx_All v1.0.2856.0 release also this month?

  • Anonymous
    July 06, 2011
    althogh its too hard to work with but I love it!  Thank you

  • Anonymous
    July 06, 2011
    v1.0.2856.0 is pretty old, stick with v1.0.10621.0 or v1.1.10621.0

  • Anonymous
    July 06, 2011
    @Arash, why is it too hard?  what is tripping you up?  perhaps, we can help you or improve the documentation in those areas.

  • Anonymous
    July 13, 2011
    I've been upgrading from build 1.0.2856 to 1.1.10621 and managed towork out most of the changes, but I can't work out what happened to the concurrent collections that were in System.Collections.Concurrent in the Silverlight 4 (and probably .Net35) version? Thanks.

  • Anonymous
    July 20, 2011
    Are there any plans on including the Rx framework as a core feature in the .NET framework?

  • Anonymous
    August 30, 2011
    ReplaySubject is cool. I would consider the items keyed by something e.g. publishing 1, 2,3,1 ... the subscriber who joins later should only get 1,2,3  ..

  • Anonymous
    October 07, 2011
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 24, 2011
    Hello, When do you plan to release next version of Rx for javaScript (RxJS)? I have a problem with it: I need to get some meta information about RxJS, so i used RxJS.dll. But it depends on sscorlib.dll (library of old version 0.5.6.0 Script#)? that is not in redistributable package of RxJS. And I can't find this dll anywhere (( I contact with Script# developer, and he don't have old version too (((

  1. When you plan to release new version of RxJS?
  2. Is it possible to give me RxJS package WITH Script# dependency libraries?
  3. Or is it possible to give me RxJS source, and I compile it with latest Script# by myself? Thanx, Igor.

  • Anonymous
    February 14, 2012
    You released an experimental release of Rx that works is compatible with Silverlight 5 back in June 2011. Silverlight 5 was released back in December 2011. When is the next stable release for Silverlight 5 and other platforms planned? Thanks in advance, Phil P.S. It would great to see Rx available as open source so that it can be supported by the community.

  • Anonymous
    February 14, 2012
    The 1.0 SP1 release contains a supported version for Silverlight 5.

  • Anonymous
    February 22, 2012
    Thanks Bart, didn't even realise the SP1 release existed (it's not obvious from Rx download page msdn.microsoft.com/.../gg577610).