Hyper-V Reverse Replication to server without VMs

Mike Vaughn 0 Reputation points
2024-02-06T21:55:34.29+00:00

Hello, I had server A replicating to server B. Sunday we had hardware failure on server A, so I used failover on server B and all has been fine. Traveled 6 hours to server A location, long story short we lost enough drives in the array that I had to create a new array and logical drive. The host server is fine, it was just the data disk where the VMs were stored that we lost. Hyper-V manager shows failed/stopped critical state for the VMs that were originally on the server. Question is can I use reverse replication from Server B to Server A and get them back, or will I need to use live migration to get them?

Windows for business Windows Client for IT Pros Storage high availability Virtualization and Hyper-V
0 comments No comments
{count} votes

3 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Alex Bykovskyi 2,241 Reputation points
    2024-02-07T18:15:39.73+00:00

    Hey,

    You will need to perform failover to server B and then configure reverse replication to get data back to original server. The following article should help: https://www.red-gate.com/simple-talk/devops/containers-and-virtualization/a-practical-guide-to-microsoft-hyper-v-replica-part-ii/

    As another option, you can also consider using StarWind VSAN to create replicated shared storage pools between your servers and create Failover Cluster to make your VMs highly available. The following guide covers the configuration process: https://www.starwindsoftware.com/resource-library/starwind-virtual-san-for-hyper-v-2-node-hyperconverged-scenario-with-windows-server-2016/

    Cheers,

    Alex Bykovskyi

    StarWind Software

    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.


  2. Alex Bykovskyi 2,241 Reputation points
    2024-02-07T18:19:11.8133333+00:00

    duplicated the answer

    0 comments No comments

  3. Anonymous
    2024-02-08T06:02:02.06+00:00

      Hi Mike, Thanks for your post. Based on my research, I think using reverse replication from Server B to Server A has less risk than using live migration, because the primary server still has risk and cannot guarantee the result of live migration. If the replication still not help, alternatively, you can manually move the virtual disks from the secondary host to the primary one and just resume replication.   Best Regards, Ian Xue


    If the Answer is helpful, please click "Accept Answer" and upvote it. Note: Please follow the steps in our documentation to enable e-mail notifications if you want to receive the related email notification for this thread.

    0 comments No comments

Your answer

Answers can be marked as Accepted Answers by the question author, which helps users to know the answer solved the author's problem.