Hi Karl Gardner,
Thanks for reaching out to Microsoft Q&A.
For me, your understanding is correct. Putting in more details so other readers can benefit.
Bounded Staleness Consistency:
In bounded staleness consistency, the lag of data between any two regions is always less than a specified amount. This amount can be defined in two ways:
- K versions (updates): The maximum number of versions (updates) an item may be behind.
- T time interval: The maximum time interval reads might lag behind the writes.
If the data lag in a region (determined per physical partition) exceeds the configured staleness value, writes for that partition are throttled until staleness is back within the configured upper bound.
This means....
- The staleness for reads in a particular region and partition can technically reach or exceed the configured time limit (T).
- However, once this happens, any new writes to that partition will be throttled (slowed down or rejected) until the staleness goes back within the configured upper bound.
- The number of versions (K) that the reads can lag behind will also be bounded by the configured value, even if the time limit (T) is exceeded.
Your interpretation is correct! The data lag can technically exceed the time limit, but the system will throttle writes to bring it back within the specified bounds. The versions K will not be exceeded, but there might be brief periods where the time T is exceeded during the write throttling process. This mechanism ensures that the bounded staleness consistency level provides a predictable and manageable consistency model, balancing performance and data freshness across distributed regions and partitions in Cosmos DB.
Please 'Upvote'(Thumbs-up) and 'Accept' as an answer if the reply was helpful. This will benefit other community members who face the same issue.