Azure Front Door not applying the expected block-action

Erwin Verbruggen (Q42) 0 Reputation points
2024-07-25T18:56:23.38+00:00

In Azure Front Door, we have a Front Door WAF policy with a custom (example) rule that blocks all IP addresses starting with 111.222.:

enter image description here

(where 10 is the lowest Priority, so first to be applied)

When querying the Front Door Logs with the following KQL:

AzureDiagnostics| where clientIP_s startswith "111.222." or clientIp_s startswith "111.222."| project clientIP_s, clientIp_s, ruleName_s, action_s, httpStatusCode_s| take 10

we get the following results:

clientIP_s clientIp_s ruleName_s action_s httpStatusCode_s
111.222.3.4 429
111.222.5.6 429
111.222.7.8 StackOverflowExample Block
111.222.9.0 StackOverflowExample Block
111.222.9.0 429

In case an IP address is matched as a clientIp_s (lower case p), it is not picked up by the rule StackOverflowExample. Only when matched as a clientIP_s (upper case P) is it picked up by StackOverflowExample and correctly blocked. Note that there is another rate-limiting rule that matches the URL for the clientIp_s requests and returns a 429.

Some observations:

  • there are IP addresses that only occur as a clientIP_s (111.222.3.4 and 111.222.5.6)
  • there are IP addresses that only occur as a clientIp_s (111.222.7.8)
  • there are IP addresses that occur as both a clientIP_s and clientIp_s (111.222.9.0)

How come the clientIp_s are not matched by the rule StackOverflowExample?

Azure Front Door
Azure Front Door
An Azure service that provides a cloud content delivery network with threat protection.
691 questions
0 comments No comments
{count} votes

1 answer

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Pinaki Ghatak 4,610 Reputation points Microsoft Employee
    2024-07-25T19:56:07.9733333+00:00

    Hi @Erwin Verbruggen (Q42)

    Please note, there are couple of things going on here, and is a multi-step question. Let's take it step-by-step.

    Firstly, there are similar fields for clientIP because:

    • clientIP_s: This field is typically used in the FrontdoorAccessLog category. It captures the IP address of the client making the request to Azure Front Door
    • clientIp_s: This field is used in the FrontdoorWebApplicationFirewallLog category. It also captures the client's IP address but is specifically related to logs generated by the Web Application Firewall (WAF) associated with Azure Front Door

    These fields help in tracking and analyzing the source of requests and any potential security threats. Now, depending on which license SKU of Azure Front door you are using, you'd see difference if you rin the followng queries.

    Front Door

    Diagnostic logs Category == "FrontdoorAccessLog" or Category == "FrontdoorWebApplicationFirewallLog“
    

    Log field clientIp_s for client IP info

    Log field trackingReference_s for all WAF + Access logs related to a single HTTP request

    Front Door Premium

    Diagnostic logs Category == "FrontDoorWebApplicationFirewallLog" or Category == "FrontDoorAccessLog“
    

    Log field clientIP_s for client IP info

    Application Gateway

    Diagnostic logs Category == "ApplicationGatewayAccessLog" or Category == "ApplicationGatewayFirewallLog“
    

    Log field clientIp_s for client IP info

    So, the fact there is already another filter rule you applied that returns a 429 on field clientIp_s might clash with your StackOverFlow example.

    Here are options you can try

    1. Make a case-insensitive query

    Change your query to something like this:

    AzureDiagnostics
    | where tolower(clientIp_s) startswith "111.222."
    | project clientIp_s, ruleName_s, action_s, httpStatusCode_s
    | take 10
    

    2. Create the custom rule on PowerShell

    To modify your custom rule to match both clientIP_s and clientIp_s, you would need to add a match condition for each in your WAF policy rule.

    Here’s an example of how you can do this using Azure PowerShell. Running these, will create your custom rule.

    # Define match conditions for clientIP_s and clientIp_s
    $clientIP = New-AzFrontDoorWafMatchConditionObject -MatchVariable clientIP_s -OperatorProperty IPMatch -MatchValue "111.222."
    $clientIp = New-AzFrontDoorWafMatchConditionObject -MatchVariable clientIp_s -OperatorProperty IPMatch -MatchValue "111.222."
    
    # Add these match conditions to your custom rule
    $customRule = New-AzFrontDoorWafCustomRuleObject -Name "StackOverflowExample" -RuleType MatchRule -MatchCondition $clientIP,$clientIp -Action Block -Priority 1
    

    You may also use Azure CLI (for instance in Linux) as:

    # Define the WAF policy name and resource group
    waf_policy_name="your-waf-policy-name"
    resource_group="your-resource-group-name"
    
    # Define the custom rule name and priority
    custom_rule_name="StackOverflowExample"
    priority=100
    
    # Define the IP address prefix to block
    ip_prefix="111.222."
    
    # Create the match conditions for clientIP_s and clientIp_s
    match_condition_clientIP="clientIP_s=IPMatch=$ip_prefix"
    match_condition_clientIp="clientIp_s=IPMatch=$ip_prefix"
    
    # Create the custom rule with the match conditions
    az network front-door waf-policy rule create \
    dockerfile
    --policy-name $waf_policy_name \
    --resource-group $resource_group \
    --name $custom_rule_name \
    --priority $priority \
    --action Block \
    --rule-type MatchRule \
    --match-condition $match_condition_clientIP $match_condition_clientIp
    

    I'd also suggest reading here:

    Policy settings for Web Application Firewall in Azure Front Door


    I hope that this response has addressed your query and helped you overcome your challenges. If so, please mark this response as Answered. This will not only acknowledge our efforts, but also assist other community members who may be looking for similar solutions.

    1 person found this answer helpful.

Your answer

Answers can be marked as Accepted Answers by the question author, which helps users to know the answer solved the author's problem.