Performance Discrepancy Between Templated Control and Direct Implementation
I encountered a performance issue while working on a project where I utilized two identical buttons with all properties set the same. The only difference was in the content: one button utilized a PathIcon
inside a Viewbox
, while the other utilized a templated control called SvgIcon
, which also encapsulated the same PathIcon
inside a Viewbox
. Surprisingly, I noticed a significant time discrepancy between the two implementations, with the templated control taking longer.
Here's a breakdown of the performance observation:
- Button 1: Utilized a
PathIcon
inside aViewbox
. - Button 2: Utilized a templated control called
SvgIcon
, which also contained aPathIcon
inside aViewbox
. - Both buttons had identical paths for their content.
Upon profiling the application, I found that the templated control (SvgIcon
) alone consumed approximately 0.52 milliseconds more time compared to directly using PathIcon
inside Viewbox
.
When utilizing these controls within a ListView
, the impact on performance becomes more noticeable.
I'm seeking insights into why there's a performance disparity between these seemingly similar implementations. Could anyone give potential reasons for this discrepancy and suggest optimizations to mitigate the performance overhead introduced by the templated control (SvgIcon
) when used within a ListView
?