Edit

Share via


CA1835: Prefer the memory-based overloads of ReadAsync/WriteAsync methods in stream-based classes

Property Value
Type name PreferStreamAsyncMemoryOverloads
Rule ID CA1835
Title Prefer the memory-based overloads of ReadAsync/WriteAsync methods in stream-based classes
Category Performance
Fix is breaking or non-breaking Non-breaking
Enabled by default in .NET 9 As suggestion

Cause

This rule locates awaited invocations of the byte-array-based method overloads for ReadAsync and WriteAsync, and suggests using the memory-based method overloads instead, because they are more efficient.

Rule description

The memory-based method overloads have a more efficient memory usage than the byte array-based ones.

The rule works on ReadAsync and WriteAsync invocations of any class that inherits from Stream.

The rule only works when the method is preceded by the await keyword.

Detected method Suggested method
ReadAsync(Byte[], Int32, Int32, CancellationToken) ReadAsync(Memory<Byte>, CancellationToken)
ReadAsync(Byte[], Int32, Int32) ReadAsync(Memory<Byte>, CancellationToken) with CancellationToken set to default in C#, or Nothing in Visual Basic.
WriteAsync(Byte[], Int32, Int32, CancellationToken) WriteAsync(ReadOnlyMemory<Byte>, CancellationToken)
WriteAsync(Byte[], Int32, Int32) WriteAsync(ReadOnlyMemory<Byte>, CancellationToken) with CancellationToken set to default in C#, or Nothing in Visual Basic.

Important

Make sure to pass the offset and count integer arguments to the created Memory or ReadOnlyMemory instances.

Note

Rule CA1835 is available in all .NET versions where the memory-based overloads are available:

  • .NET Standard 2.1 and above.
  • .NET Core 2.1 and above.

How to fix violations

You can either fix them manually, or you can opt to let Visual Studio do it for you, by hovering over the light bulb that shows up next to the method invocation, and selecting the suggested change. Example:

Code fix for CA1835 - Prefer the memory-based overloads of ReadAsync/WriteAsync methods in stream-based classes

The rule can detect a variety of violations for the ReadAsync and WriteAsync methods. Here are examples of the cases that the rule can detect:

Example 1

Invocations of ReadAsync, without and with a CancellationToken argument:

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Threading;

class MyClass
{
    public async void MyMethod(CancellationToken ct)
    {
        using (FileStream s = new FileStream("path.txt", FileMode.Create))
        {
            byte[] buffer = new byte[s.Length];
            await s.ReadAsync(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
            await s.ReadAsync(buffer, 0, buffer.Length, ct);
        }
    }
}

Fix:

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Threading;

class MyClass
{
    public async void MyMethod(CancellationToken ct)
    {
        using (FileStream s = new FileStream("path.txt", FileMode.Create))
        {
            byte[] buffer = new byte[s.Length];
            await s.ReadAsync(buffer.AsMemory(0, buffer.Length));
            await s.ReadAsync(buffer.AsMemory(0, buffer.Length), ct);
        }
    }
}

Example 2

Invocations of WriteAsync, without and with a CancellationToken argument:

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Threading;

class MyClass
{
    public async void MyMethod(CancellationToken ct)
    {
        using (FileStream s = File.Open("path.txt", FileMode.Open))
        {
            byte[] buffer = { 0xBA, 0x5E, 0xBA, 0x11, 0xF0, 0x07, 0xBA, 0x11 };
            await s.WriteAsync(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
            await s.WriteAsync(buffer, 0, buffer.Length, ct);
        }
    }
}

Fix:

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Threading;

class MyClass
{
    public async void MyMethod()
    {
        using (FileStream s = File.Open("path.txt", FileMode.Open))
        {
            byte[] buffer = { 0xBA, 0x5E, 0xBA, 0x11, 0xF0, 0x07, 0xBA, 0x11 };
            await s.WriteAsync(buffer.AsMemory(0, buffer.Length));
            await s.WriteAsync(buffer.AsMemory(0, buffer.Length), ct);
        }
    }
}

Example 3

Invocations with ConfigureAwait:

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Threading;

class MyClass
{
    public async void MyMethod()
    {
        using (FileStream s = File.Open("path.txt", FileMode.Open))
        {
            byte[] buffer1 = { 0xBA, 0x5E, 0xBA, 0x11, 0xF0, 0x07, 0xBA, 0x11 };
            await s.WriteAsync(buffer1, 0, buffer1.Length).ConfigureAwait(false);

            byte[] buffer2 = new byte[s.Length];
            await s.ReadAsync(buffer2, 0, buffer2.Length).ConfigureAwait(true);
        }
    }
}

Fix:

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Threading;

class MyClass
{
    public async void MyMethod()
    {
        using (FileStream s = File.Open("path.txt", FileMode.Open))
        {
            byte[] buffer1 = { 0xBA, 0x5E, 0xBA, 0x11, 0xF0, 0x07, 0xBA, 0x11 };
            await s.WriteAsync(buffer1.AsMemory(0, buffer1.Length)).ConfigureAwait(false);

            byte[] buffer2 = new byte[s.Length];
            await s.ReadAsync(buffer2.AsMemory(0, buffer.Length)).ConfigureAwait(true);
        }
    }
}

Non-violations

Following are some examples of invocations where the rule will not be fired.

The return value is saved in a Task variable instead of being awaited:

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;

class MyClass
{
    public void MyMethod()
    {
        byte[] buffer = { 0xBA, 0x5E, 0xBA, 0x11, 0xF0, 0x07, 0xBA, 0x11 };
        using (FileStream s = new FileStream("path.txt", FileMode.Create))
        {
            Task t = s.WriteAsync(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
        }
    }
}

The return value is returned by the wrapping method instead of being awaited:

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;

class MyClass
{
    public Task MyMethod(FileStream s, byte[] buffer)
    {
        return s.WriteAsync(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
    }
}

The return value is used to call ContinueWith, which is the method being awaited:

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;

class MyClass
{
    public void MyMethod()
    {
        byte[] buffer = { 0xBA, 0x5E, 0xBA, 0x11, 0xF0, 0x07, 0xBA, 0x11 };
        using (FileStream s = new FileStream("path.txt", FileMode.Create))
        {
            await s.WriteAsync(buffer, 0, buffer.Length).ContinueWith(c => { /* ... */ });
        }
    }
}

When to suppress warnings

It's safe to suppress a violation of this rule if you're not concerned about improving performance when reading or writing buffers in stream-based classes.

Suppress a warning

If you just want to suppress a single violation, add preprocessor directives to your source file to disable and then re-enable the rule.

#pragma warning disable CA1835
// The code that's violating the rule is on this line.
#pragma warning restore CA1835

To disable the rule for a file, folder, or project, set its severity to none in the configuration file.

[*.{cs,vb}]
dotnet_diagnostic.CA1835.severity = none

For more information, see How to suppress code analysis warnings.

See also