Share via

Microsoft Project 2016 Planned % complete calculation

Anonymous
2017-01-26T11:44:01+00:00

I am working with a schedule that is utilizing MSP 2016. The client has asked for a Planned % complete to compare against the % complete. I looked in all the books I have and ended up going on line. The only thing I could find was a you tube video and ended up n using that. But it was based on MSP 2010 & 2013.

My first problem is that the calculation returns an error for the Milestones, but works for the tasks, does anyone know how to get rid of this problem?

My second problem is that if I move the dates out the calculation sends back a negative planned value which has been picked up from the Client and has been rejected.

I am not that familiar with MSP to be honest let alone 2016 so any help would be greatly appreciated. Please see formulas used below

Number column 1

Val(ProjDurConv(Duration,pjDays))

Number column 2

IIf(DateDiff("d",Start,[Status Date])>=Val(ProjDurConv([Baseline Duration],pjDays)),Val(ProjDurConv([Baseline Duration],pjDays)),IIf(DateDiff("d",[Baseline Start],[Status Date])<=0,0,DateDiff("d",Start,[Status Date])))

Number Column 3

Number2/Number1

Text30

format(Number3,"0%")

Microsoft 365 and Office | Access | For home | Windows

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

7 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2017-01-27T03:17:57+00:00

    Jill,

    Suppose you have a project where everything is planned/scheduled to happen in the future relative to now. None of the tasks have any progress recorded against them. None of the tasks have any actuals. That is, none of them have an actual start, actual duration, actual finish, actual work or actual cost.

    You can check this in the tracking table, where all of the fields will be "NA" except that the remaining duration will be the total duration.

    Now you want to know what will be the "% complete" as at some date/time in the future. Let's call that the future status date. Forget about % complete. It will take care of itself when you provide the actuals.

    Go to project, project information. Set the status date to the future date you have in mind.

    Select all of the tasks. The easy way is to go to view, outline, show all subtasks, and then select the top left corner above the ID numbers.

    Now click on task, mark on track. This will fill in all of the actuals up to the status date. Whatever the % complete is, that's your "planned % complete" as at that date.

    Any help?

    Was this answer helpful?

    20+ people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  2. John Project 49,705 Reputation points Volunteer Moderator
    2017-10-10T20:43:58+00:00

    Sandy,

    This is the formula Jan presented in the referenced link (with one misplaced ")" removed so the formula will work)

    Iif(([Baseline Duration])>0,([Actual Duration]/[Baseline Duration])*100,0)

    I don't "know" exactly what formula you are "looking for" but that's correct, the status date does not enter into the equation. However for duration tracking a more thorough expression of a "planned complete" value would measure the amount of duration between the actual start and the status date. For that case the formula is more complex but could look like this:

    IIf(([Baseline Duration])>0,((ProjDateDiff([Baseline Start],[Status Date])+[Minutes Per Day])/[Baseline Duration])*100,0) & "%".

    To demonstrate, the following screen shot shows a simple 10 day task. The first line shows the task as planned. The second line shows the task as of the status date. The task didn't start as planned, it started two days late and the declared completion (i.e. % Complete) is 20%. The original formula also shows a 20% value while the revised formula, queued to the status date, shows the task should be 50% complete by the close of business on the status date (i.e. "planned" completion as of the status date and based on the baseline plan). I also included a milestone to show the formula is "stable" for milestones, which was one of the issues in the referenced thread.

    Hope this helps.

    John

    Was this answer helpful?

    6 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  3. John Project 49,705 Reputation points Volunteer Moderator
    2017-01-26T16:35:52+00:00

    Jill,

    The term "planned percent complete" is subjective in nature and can mean different things to different people. First I suggest you read the following thread which summarizes the various concepts.

    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/b2c99deb-c388-47aa-a8ef-c31854851d9a/tracking-percent-complete-versus-planned?forum=projectprofessional2010general.

    As far as the formula you found on U-tube, it is considerably more complex than it needs to be. The classical way of handling planned versus actual is by using earned value (as discussed in the reference), but if you decide a simpler approach is all you need, then the formula presented by Jan De Messemaeker toward the end of the thread should get you there.

    Hope this helps.

    John

    Was this answer helpful?

    6 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2017-01-27T10:40:54+00:00

    Thank you Trevor, I am going to try all the responses I have and see where it takes me. Your response has been greatly appreciated as I am a Primavera girl and I have found this problem challenging... Again many thanks

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2017-01-27T10:39:33+00:00

    Thank You John any help right is greatly appreciated.. I am a Primavera girl so finding this problem quite challenging!!!! but got the thread and away to see if it works...

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments