A group of Microsoft Products and technologies used for sharing and managing content, knowledge, and applications.
Hi K.W,
Have you referred to the information above? Do you need further help on this issue?
Thanks,
Cliff
This browser is no longer supported.
Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.
When setting up a new Approval workflow for an existing document repository (over 2,000 docs in library), will the approval status apply to all of the documents?
If so, will every document that's added to the library going forward "require" approval?
What suggestions are there for managing a legacy library but adding new documents that may require approval?
Thanks!
A group of Microsoft Products and technologies used for sharing and managing content, knowledge, and applications.
Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.
Answer accepted by question author
Hi K.W,
Have you referred to the information above? Do you need further help on this issue?
Thanks,
Cliff
Answer accepted by question author
Hi K.W,
From your description, it seems that you want all the files’ status in the existing library to be “require approval” in SharePoint Online and this also applies to a newly added file.
If yes, you don’t need to create a new approval workflow. You can achieve your requirement via clicking on Library Settings>Version settings>select Yes in Require content approval for submitted items?. After checking the option, the newly added files’ status will be Pending and the existing files’ status is Approval. However, you can bulk-change the existing files’ status to Pending via bulk-selecting the files in Content and structure>Actions>Check out>Check in. To enable Content and structure, click Site collection features in Site Collection Administration>click Active in SharePoint Server Publishing Infrastructure.
Thanks,
Cliff
Cliff - My problem was actually the opposite of how I described it However, the bulk-change solution worked.
Thanks a lot.