I'm really taken with the new voice—it breathes life into my novel. It seems that preferences vary from person to person. While I do see the value in having the flexibility to select a more neutral voice for those who prefer it, I'm strongly in favor of retaining the new voice as well!
I’m glad you’re able to enjoy it. The problem with the new voice for me is that it assumes far too much about the emotion behind the text. Like most of these trained voices, it seems to display emotion based on word choice, but the same phrase can be meant to be said a thousand different ways depending on context. Their tool isn’t sophisticated enough to pick up on context, though, so it’s getting it all wrong. It’s reading some very emotional scenes in my novel with the same peppy energy a preschool teacher would use to read a book about dinosaurs to four-year-olds. It’s distracting and drowns out my own intentions for the scene. My argument is the voice shouldn’t be “performing” if it’s not sophisticated enough to get it right.
It would probably work for everyone if both versions of the female voice could be available. For now, I’m glad a fellow novelist is benefiting from the change. Happy writing to you, friend.