Share via

Azure AI Search semantic/hybrid search: conversational query returns results influenced by generic terms (“books”) instead of topic (“anatomy”)

mona dar 0 Reputation points
2026-01-15T13:34:15.9866667+00:00

Hello,

I’m implementing search and recommendations for a books catalog using Azure AI Search and I’m looking for guidance on configuring semantic + vector/hybrid search so conversational queries focus on the topic intent (e.g., “anatomy”) rather than generic terms (e.g., “books”, “give”).

Scenario / Goal

End users submit conversational queries such as:

  • “Hi, how are you — can you recommend books related to anatomy?”

“Give me books about anatomy”

Our goal is: return books that are actually related to anatomy, and avoid results that match generic words like “books” when the user intent is clearly the topic “anatomy”.

What we are observing (problem)

In practice, the results appear to be influenced by all words in the query, not just the topic being asked for. For example, we are getting matches driven by generic terms such as “books” (and other non-topic words), even when our intent is to retrieve results strictly related to “anatomy”.

Index / Setup (high level)

Documents are books (metadata fields such as Id/Title/Author, etc.)

We store vectors in a field named: embedding

We created a semantic configuration in the Azure portal:

SemanticConfigurationName: semantic-trial

We are using the .NET SDK (Azure.Search.Documents) and SearchClient.

(If needed, I can share a sanitized index schema + sample documents.)

Approach 1: Pure vector search (searchText = null)

We intentionally keep searchText = null to avoid keyword matching and run pure vector similarity over the embeddingfield.

public async Task<(long? TotalCount, List<ScoredBookResult> Results)> PureVectorSearchAsync(float[] vector, int top)
{
    var vectorQuery = new VectorizedQuery(vector.AsMemory())
    {
        KNearestNeighborsCount = top,
        Fields = { "embedding" }
    };

    var options = new SearchOptions
    {
        Size = top,
        VectorSearch = new VectorSearchOptions
        {
            Queries = { vectorQuery }
        }
    };

    var response = await _searchClient.SearchAsync<BookDocument>(null, options);

    var list = new List<ScoredBookResult>();
    await foreach (var r in response.Value.GetResultsAsync())
    {
        list.Add(new ScoredBookResult
        {
            Document = r.Document,
            Score = r.SemanticSearch.RerankerScore ?? r.Score ?? 0
        });
    }

    return (response.Value.TotalCount, list);
}

Observed outcome: We still see results that do not appear to be tightly focused on the topic intent (e.g., “anatomy”), and we need clarification on what scoring should be used here (see questions below).

Approach 2: Hybrid + semantic reranking (vector + semantic)

We run a hybrid request where:

We set QueryType = SearchQueryType.Semantic

We use SemanticConfigurationName = "semantic-trial"

We disable captions/answers for performance

We include a vector query with a larger candidate pool (KNearestNeighborsCount = 50)

We select only small fields (Id/Title/Author)

public async Task<(long? TotalCount, List<ScoredBookResult> Results)> OptimizedSearchAsync(
    string userQuery,
    float[] vector,
    int top = 5)
{
    var vectorQuery = new VectorizedQuery(vector.AsMemory())
    {
        KNearestNeighborsCount = 50,
        Fields = { "embedding" }
    };

    var options = new SearchOptions
    {
        Size = top,
        IncludeTotalCount = true,

        QueryType = SearchQueryType.Semantic,
        SemanticSearch = new SemanticSearchOptions
        {
            SemanticConfigurationName = "semantic-trial",
            QueryCaption = new QueryCaption(QueryCaptionType.None),
            QueryAnswer = new QueryAnswer(QueryAnswerType.None)
        },
        VectorSearch = new VectorSearchOptions
        {
            Queries = { vectorQuery }
        }
    };

    options.Select.Add(nameof(BookDocument.Id));
    options.Select.Add(nameof(BookDocument.Title));
    options.Select.Add(nameof(BookDocument.Author));

    var response = await _searchClient.SearchAsync<BookDocument>(userQuery, options);

    var list = new List<ScoredBookResult>();
    await foreach (var r in response.Value.GetResultsAsync())
    {
        list.Add(new ScoredBookResult
        {
            Document = r.Document,
            Score = r.SemanticSearch.RerankerScore ?? r.Score ?? 0
        });
    }

    return (response.Value.TotalCount, list);
}

Observed outcome: With user queries like “give me books about anatomy”, results still appear influenced by generic terms like “books” instead of focusing only on the topic “anatomy”.

Expected vs Actual

Expected: Query “give me books about anatomy” should behave like a topic query for “anatomy”, returning only books relevant to anatomy.

Actual: Results can include books that match generic query terms (e.g., “books”) even if they are not anatomy-related.

Questions

  1. How should conversational queries be handled?
    • Is it recommended to normalize/clean the user query on the application side (remove greetings/filler, reduce to “anatomy”) before calling Azure AI Search?
  2. Hybrid + semantic best practices
    • What is the recommended pattern for hybrid search with semantic ranking so the topic intent dominates and generic words do not drift results?
    • Should we be using semanticQuery instead of relying only on QueryType = Semantic with SearchAsync(userQuery, ...)?
  3. Pure vector + scoring
    • In pure vector mode (searchText = null), should SemanticSearch.RerankerScore exist at all?
    • If reranker score is not expected, what is the correct way to rank/interpret results (use vector similarity score only)?
  4. Configuration guidance
    • Which fields should be prioritized in the semantic configuration for a books catalog (title, description, subjects/categories, etc.)?
    • Any recommended analyzers/stopword settings or query parameters (searchMode=any/allsearchFields, etc.) to avoid matches driven by generic terms?

Thank you.

Azure AI Search
Azure AI Search

An Azure search service with built-in artificial intelligence capabilities that enrich information to help identify and explore relevant content at scale.


2 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Golla Venkata Pavani 4,090 Reputation points Microsoft External Staff Moderator
    2026-02-03T17:46:28.7133333+00:00

    Hi @mona dar ,

    Thanks for the thorough post and code samples, this is a classic challenge with conversational queries in hybrid + semantic setups, where common words like "books" or "give" can pull in too many irrelevant matches during the initial retrieval stage.

    The core issue is that the keyword/BM25 part of hybrid search (when you pass the full query to SearchAsync(userQuery, ...)) treats every term equally, so generic words compete with your topic ("anatomy"). Semantic reranking helps reorder the top 50 candidates, but it can't fix a noisy initial candidate set.

    Recommended fix: separate retrieval from reranking intent

    In the .NET SDK (Azure.Search.Documents), use the SemanticSearch.SemanticQuery property to pass the full conversational query only for semantic reranking, captions, and answers. Meanwhile, clean the query on your app side and use that cleaned version for the main search parameter (keyword) and/or vector embedding.

    This keeps initial retrieval (BM25 + vector) tightly focused on the topic, while semantic reranking uses the natural-language context to promote the most relevant results.

    Example adjustment to your OptimizedSearchAsync:

    // Simple app-side cleaning example (expand with regex/NLP as needed)
    string cleanedQuery = CleanQuery(userQuery);  // e.g., "give me books about anatomy" → "anatomy books" or just "anatomy"
    // Generate vector from full query for semantic similarity
    float[] vector = GetEmbedding(userQuery);  // or cleanedQuery, test both
    var vectorQuery = new VectorizedQuery(vector.AsMemory())
    {
        KNearestNeighborsCount = 50,
        Fields = { "embedding" }
    };
    var options = new SearchOptions
    {
        Size = top,
        IncludeTotalCount = true,
        QueryType = SearchQueryType.Semantic,
        SemanticSearch = new SemanticSearchOptions
        {
            SemanticConfigurationName = "semantic-trial",
            SemanticQuery = userQuery,  // <-- full conversational text here for reranking intent
            QueryCaption = new QueryCaption(QueryCaptionType.None),
            QueryAnswer = new QueryAnswer(QueryAnswerType.None)
        },
        VectorSearch = new VectorSearchOptions
        {
            Queries = { vectorQuery }
        }
    };
    // Optional: limit keyword search to content-rich fields to reduce generic noise
    options.SearchFields.Add("title");
    options.SearchFields.Add("description");  // or subjects/categories if you have them
    var response = await _searchClient.SearchAsync<BookDocument>(cleanedQuery, options);
    

    This pattern is directly supported: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/search/semantic-how-to-query-request

    Quick answers to your specific questions

    • Conversational queries: Yes, preprocess/clean on the app side to strip fillers/greetings (e.g., keep only nouns/topics like "anatomy"). This is a common pattern for better recall/precision in RAG-like scenarios.
    • Hybrid + semantic best practices: Use cleaned query for search + vectors, full query for SemanticQuery. Set KNearestNeighborsCount=50 for the vector part, and prioritize content fields in your semantic config (see below).
    • Pure vector mode: No, SemanticSearch.RerankerScore won't be populated without a text-based query (semantic reranking requires it). Rely on the vector similarity score (r.Score).
    • Semantic configuration fields: For books, order like this (first = highest priority):
      1. Description/summary/content (longer prose for context)
      2. Title
      3. Subjects/categories/genres/keywords Keep to 3-5 fields total due to ~2,000 token limit. Full guide: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/search/semantic-how-to-configure
    • Other tips: Use English analyzers with stopword removal, searchMode=all if you want stricter term matching, and limit searchFields to avoid metadata noise.

    Hybrid overview here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/search/hybrid-search-overview

    And .NET SDK reference for SemanticSearchOptions: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/azure.search.documents.models.semanticsearchoptions.semanticquery?view=azure-dotnet

    Kindly let us know if the above comment helps or you need further assistance on this issue.

    Please "accept" if the information helped you. This will help us and others in the community as well.

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments

  2. Q&A Assist
    2026-01-15T13:34:29.35+00:00
    AI generated content. This question contains an answer created with AI from Q&A Assist. Learn more

    To address your concerns regarding the Azure AI Search implementation for your books catalog, here are some insights and recommendations based on your queries:

    1. Handling Conversational Queries:
      • It is advisable to preprocess user queries on the application side. Normalizing or cleaning the input to focus on the topic (e.g., extracting "anatomy" from "give me books about anatomy") can help in reducing noise from generic terms. This preprocessing can enhance the relevance of the search results.
    2. Hybrid + Semantic Best Practices:
      • To ensure that the topic intent dominates in hybrid search, consider using both semanticQuery and vectorQuery. This allows you to leverage the strengths of both semantic understanding and vector similarity. Additionally, ensure that your semantic configuration is well-tuned to prioritize fields that are most relevant to the content of your documents (e.g., title, description).
      • You may also want to experiment with the searchMode parameter, setting it to all to ensure that all terms in the query are considered in the context of the semantic search.
    3. Pure Vector + Scoring:
      • In pure vector mode (when searchText is null), the SemanticSearch.RerankerScore should not be expected, as there is no semantic processing occurring. Instead, focus on the vector similarity score for ranking results. This score reflects how closely the vectors match, which is the primary metric in this mode.
    4. Configuration Guidance:
      • For a books catalog, prioritize fields such as title, description, and subjects/categories in your semantic configuration. These fields are likely to provide the most context and relevance for user queries.
      • Consider using analyzers that can help filter out common stopwords and irrelevant terms. This can be done by configuring your index to use custom analyzers that are suited for your content type. Additionally, using searchFields to specify which fields to search against can help avoid matches driven by generic terms.

    By implementing these strategies, you should be able to improve the relevance of your search results and better align them with user intent.


    References:

Your answer

Answers can be marked as 'Accepted' by the question author and 'Recommended' by moderators, which helps users know the answer solved the author's problem.