Is Windows Defender Application Control really practical to maintain compared to AppLocker?

This is actually rather common - WDAC has a steep upfront cost because it forces you to be explicit about trust, whereas AppLocker lets a lot slide implicitly. Early on, every update feels like it breaks something because your policy surface isn’t mature yet. That phase is painful, but it doesn’t last forever if the deployment is structured well.

In environments where WDAC becomes “manageable,” it’s usually because you stop treating policies as static allowlists and start treating them like living artifacts with automation behind them. The biggest shift is moving away from brittle file hash rules toward publisher-based rules and, where appropriate, managed installer or intelligent security graph features. If you rely heavily on hashes, you’ll keep feeling that update pain indefinitely. If most of your estate is covered by stable publishers like Microsoft, Adobe, or your internal code-signing certs, the churn drops dramatically.

Another key factor is policy layering and audit-first rollout. To succeed long term, you should keep a base policy that rarely changes and layer supplemental policies for more dynamic apps. You also should leave parts of the environment in audit mode for longer and use telemetry to drive rule creation rather than reacting to breakages in enforced mode. Without that feedback loop, it will always feel reactive and high maintenance.

Tooling and process matter more than the technology itself. If policy generation, merging, and deployment are manual, WDAC will continue to feel heavy. Once you script policy updates, integrate them into your build or patch pipelines, and use consistent signing practices for internal apps, the operational burden drops a lot. At that point, updates stop being “events” and become part of a routine flow.

That stated, it never becomes as lightweight as AppLocker. WDAC is still more opinionated and less forgiving, and edge cases will continue to show up, especially with legacy or poorly signed software. The tradeoff is that once it stabilizes, you get a level of control and tamper resistance AppLocker simply doesn’t offer.

So it does become manageable, but only after you invest in changing how you manage application trust. If you keep approaching it with the same expectations and processes you’d use for AppLocker, it will continue to feel like high maintenance.

If the above response helps answer your question, remember to "Accept Answer" so that others in the community facing similar issues can easily find the solution. Your contribution is highly appreciated.

hth

Marcin