Share via

How to migrate an existing Content Understanding analyzer from Foundry (classic) to Content Understanding Studio?

Hasindu Rathnayake 40 Reputation points
2026-05-13T06:36:58.03+00:00

Environment:

  • Azure Content Understanding
  • Analyzer created via Foundry (classic) using API version 2025-05-01-preview
  • Target: Content Understanding Studio with GA API 2025-11-01

Background:

I have an existing custom analyzer (document type) built in Foundry (classic) using the 2025-05-01-preview API. With the GA release of 2025-11-01, I need to migrate this to the GA pipeline. The Microsoft migration guide recommends rebuilding the analyzer in Content Understanding Studio rather than migrating in-place, since preview analyzers don't fully carry over to the GA pipeline.

Questions:

  1. Is there a way to import or load an existing analyzer definition directly into Content Understanding Studio, rather than manually recreating every field from scratch?
  2. Are there any known issues when opening a Foundry (classic) project in Content Understanding Studio — for example, training data, labeled samples, or field schemas not transferring correctly?
Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools
0 comments No comments

Answer accepted by question author

  1. kagiyama yutaka 2,910 Reputation points
    2026-05-13T09:17:08.34+00:00

    I think the preview analyzer cannot be imported into GA Studio, and the supported path is to recreate the GA fields and upload a few of ur existing labeled docs to rebuild it safely.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.

1 additional answer

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Q&A Assist
    2026-05-13T06:37:13.96+00:00
    AI generated content. This question contains an answer created with AI from Q&A Assist. Learn more
    1. Importing or loading an existing analyzer definition into Content Understanding Studio

    The provided information describes two main experiences:

    • Foundry (classic), which uses the 2025-05-01-preview API.
    • Content Understanding Studio and the updated Foundry (new) portal, which are aligned with the GA 2025-11-01 API and are positioned as the recommended path for building and refining analyzers.

    The migration guidance explicitly recommends rebuilding preview analyzers in the GA environment rather than migrating them in-place. The available analyzer lifecycle operations in GA (copy, delete, replace) are described for GA analyzers and for moving analyzers between Content Understanding resources and Foundry resources, not for importing preview analyzers into Studio.

    From the available information, there is no documented mechanism to:

    • Export a Foundry (classic) 2025-05-01-preview analyzer definition and
    • Directly import that definition into Content Understanding Studio as a GA (2025-11-01) analyzer.

    Instead, the recommended pattern is:

    • Use Content Understanding Studio to rebuild the analyzer (schema, fields, and logic) on the GA pipeline.
    • Then use analyzer lifecycle APIs (copy, replace) to manage versions and move GA analyzers across resources once created.
    1. Known issues when opening Foundry (classic) projects in Content Understanding Studio

    The documentation distinguishes the environments and APIs but does not describe a supported workflow where a Foundry (classic) project is “opened” directly in Content Understanding Studio, nor does it list specific issues such as:

    • Training data not transferring
    • Labeled samples not transferring
    • Field schemas not transferring

    Instead, it emphasizes that:

    • Foundry (classic) supports the preview API 2025-05-01-preview and includes some preview-only features.
    • Content Understanding Studio is a complementary UX designed for GA and for Document Intelligence customers transitioning to Content Understanding, with its own guided workflows for labeling, testing, and refinement.
    • Analyzer lifecycle APIs (copy, delete, replace) apply in the GA (2025-11-01) context and are referenced in the GA migration guidance.

    Given this, the documented guidance is to treat preview analyzers and GA analyzers as separate and to rebuild in Studio for GA, rather than relying on automatic transfer of training data, labels, or schemas from Foundry (classic). No specific cross-environment transfer issues are enumerated; the risk is implicitly avoided by recommending a rebuild.


    References:

    Was this answer helpful?

Your answer

Answers can be marked as 'Accepted' by the question author and 'Recommended' by moderators, which helps users know the answer solved the author's problem.