It seems to me Microsoft’s vetting system operates as an insane rigid compliance algorithm, with zero humans with a modicum of understanding involved and that dreaded "your organization does not currently meet the requirements to pass verification," arrived.
Microsoft Azure Artifact Signing — Timeline and Submissions
On June 3, 2026, an Artifact Signing account named "Granny" was created in Azure subscription 1, resource group XORD_Systems, West US region, Basic SKU ($9.99/month).
Identity validation was submitted for XORD LLC with the following information:
- Organization name: XORD LLC
- Address in Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
- Phone: (859) 710-xxxx
- Email: roman@xxxx
- DUNS: 138644721
- Website: xord.io
Microsoft Vetting Operations Support rejected the submission. The stated reason was that the Wyoming Secretary of State business entity record for XORD LLC lists the principal office at 30 N Gould Street, Suite R, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801, not the Nevada address provided in the account.
Three appeals were submitted:
- Wyoming Secretary of State PDF (showing principal office in Wyoming and mailing address in Nevada).
- IRS EIN confirmation letter (CP575).
- Domain Ownership document from Hostinger.
- Bluevine bank verification letter (dated 2026-05-29).
- Operating Agreement for XORD LLC, listing our address as the principal place of business and phone (859) 710-xxxx
- SAM.gov documentation (Reference Number INC-GSAFSD21175026, submitted June 3, 2026).
On June 3, 2026, Microsoft Vetting Operations Support issued a final rejection: "Based on the information provided to date, the organization does not currently meet the requirements to pass verification. As this is the third appeal, the application has been closed."
Microsoft Vetting Operations Support overrides the official State of WY document, the most governmental agency of them all, I.R.S., the bank that is government by the government's stringent verification rules...
How does ANY of this make ANY sense?