Okay. I think we're heading in the wrong direction here. I really do appreciate your help, but I don't feel you're hearing me.
The endpoint you suggested is invalid, and also doesn't align with the Assistants API documentation.
I only asked about specific permissions agents should have because you said:
Ensure your agents have the correct permissions to be listed.
If you're referring to identity permissions, you can see I already have the correct permissions because I'm making successful calls (albeit the "Agent" being returned is the first assistant I created before our interface changed to "Agents", which is no longer accessible).
I only asked about filtering or flags because you said:
If applicable, ensure no filters or flags are hiding the agents
Since there is no filtering or flagging and you can see from the screenshots what I'm doing, that question just caused more confusion.
So let's reset... and start over if possible?
In all my screenshots above, you can see that my endpoint for viewing assistants is working. The problem is, it returns an assistant ID that existed BEFORE the interface in Azure AI Foundry changed to say AGENTS instead of ASSISTANTS. When that happened:
- My previous assistant (that you can see returns in my GET Assistants call above) is completely gone from the UI.
- I've created new assistants (or Agents as they're now called), and NONE of those are returned in the get Assistants API)
- All other HTTP requests to my existing AGENTS fail, claiming there is no Assistant
The above points can be validated with my screenshots added in an earlier comment.
And I'm back to my original question, where is the REST API documentation specific to the new Agents? Because it's no where to be found here where the Agents documentation is. and the existing API documentation for Assistants is not working with Agents I've created.
If the answer is simply "This is all in preview and we don't yet have the documentation," that's totally fine with me. At least I know I can work on other things instead of wasting both yours and my time with further questions.
Thanks,
Dennis