I appreciate what you say. But I don't have a 'nits' meter so what you're telling me is largely irrelevant. What I need to know to give an INFORMED response is what percentage of brightness those 'nits' represent!
Right now mine has automatic settings and I think a peak brightness of around 60%, but don't expect me to tell you what it is in "nits." That's like asking me to explain what the wind-chill is in watts. People don't think in tech-babble. We are practical and as a practical person and one who generally knows his way around a Windows machine, you need to speak in those terms.
I can tell you the size of the SSD and I understand RAM, CPU SPEED (including the core count and hyper-threading) and WIFI. I know how a web-browser works too and am often torn between which one I prefer, Chrome, and Edge, though I usually use EDGE because it is convenient.
That said I really think that my usage is far below even your testing. And even with that it still DOES NOT APPROACH what is advertised. I use it for FB, mostly, and general web browsing, with at the most TWO or THREE TABS OPEN. I also do a bit of banking and online shopping (Amazon). Beyond that the 'heaviest' use involves writing emails, and editing my book. With such a low power draw, I'd EXPECT it to reach the advertised level, or darn close to it.
IT DOES NOT. I am not making this up! IF I get six hours straight use, that's good but still NOWHERE NEAR what I believe you Microsoft advertises. That is the TRUTH!
I don't believe the unit is flawed. I simply believe that you guys have EXAGGERATED the length of battery life. Previous to this tablet I had a Surface Go 3. I loooooved the form factor. It was smaller but much easier for me to carry around. And I would have kept it, even with a slower processor, IF IT'S BATTERY LIFE lasted as long as it was advertised (I barely got 3 hours, with similar usage). But I traded it in and upgraded this beast simply because i felt the batter life was better. IT IS but it's a bigger machine (which I really don't like, the 10-inch form factor being ideal for me) and has more power (which I do like) but it also costs more and not as practical to lug around.
Anyhow, like I said, I don't know what you guys are using to test your machines. Honestly you need to reevaluate your criterion and speak in HUMAN TALK not tech-babble. Tell me what percentage of brightness your 'nits' represent? Tell me what power-draining apps I should keep closed. I still have it only on 60 hzs refresh, too.
Again I'm not a power user. If I want to play games, my BIG RIG Desktop will blow away any Surface or similar tablet. I need this tablet for portability, usability and reliability (battery). AS it stands I was forced to buy a 65 watt battery back up and an accessory to allow it to charge up my tablet when it got low on juice, which was about a $100.00 outlay, not including the fact I had to get an MS Keyboard.
So if you have any suggestions on how to improve battery life without requiring me to squint or use bright lights in the room to see my typing, or to somehow reduce the power of the CPU so it saves juice without compromising speed, LET ME KNOW. Otherwise I suggest you FIRE the testers because they are not accurate.
6 hrs, of web browsing, word processing and emails is the most I can get out of this even after the tricks you asked me to use. That's a big disappointment and makes me leery of trusting Microsoft tablets in the future. Plus I paid a PREMIUM PRICE along with EXTRAS to make this last a full day (8 hrs.) and it does not!
So, any more suggestions or do you want to admit there is a degree of false advertising going on?! Which is it? I'm not lying about what I said. But someone at Microsoft clearly IS!