To help put your mind at ease, the amount of energy your monitors are using is such a significantly small amount, that even if you left them running 24/7 for an entire month, assuming they are pulling a constant 60 watts, or 120 watts combined, after 31 days that will come out to 89.28 kWh. And at a rate of $0.30 per kWh (US dollar), that comes to a total of $26.78. So that's $26.78 to run both monitors
Your response could hardly be more wrong. First of all, my graphical 30" monitor has 250W - that in your numbers translates to US$111.58 bill for two monitors, which for some people is substantial money, especially when you realise annually that's US$1339. But that's not the whole story. EVERY monitor burns out, disregarding of the technology. In Summer, the excess heat can also be rather annoying, or if you want to watch a TV in the same room and the monitor, being on, is causing an unwanted radiation whilst there's a reason why the computer needs to be kept running. Either way, discussion about how much pointlessly burned electricity and how much extra electricity bill is too much, is absolutely pointless. It's wasteful, and should be avoided, fullstop.
Just to add my 5¢, what I do is I lock my computer when I leave it - it's a good habit anyway; Due to my screensaver settings, this will switch off the monitors in 1 minute after I'd locked the computer. I guess the reason why MS doesn't want to provide "switch off screens" hot key is exactly the safety/security reason - it's better to lock the computer, than just switch off screens, as a general habit.