Thank you for your response.
I believe I didn’t express my curiosity clearly in my question.
- In general, communication involves requests and responses.
When I am the server, it seems necessary to add inbound rules to receive requests.
However, when responding, wouldn’t outbound firewall rules be required as well?
Based on this, I wonder if rules should be created in pairs when looking at communication in terms of requests and responses.
If not, I’d like to understand the underlying principle.
For instance, if communication starts by receiving traffic through an inbound rule, does the response traffic also go out based on the policy defined by the inbound rule instead of an outbound rule? Am I correct in my understanding? - Is it correct to say that there should be no rules like “allow all programs and ports”?
And here’s an additional question:
- Why is it possible to create multiple firewall rules with the exact same configuration but different names?
This might be a question Microsoft should answer, but do you happen to know the reason?