RSV redundancy when used with ASR

KFM 86 Reputation points
2022-11-09T00:05:47.87+00:00

Is there any official (i.e. formally documented in the ASR product page) documentation that says RSV redundancy is ignored (and therefore not billable) when using it as a target vault for ASR?

I've always assumed that charges for RSV are independent of whatever solution was using it as a target, but then I came across this post: https://learn.microsoft.com/answers/comments/339125/view.html

When asked for clarification, MS support replied back with the following email snippet:
258407-image.png

Azure Site Recovery
Azure Site Recovery
An Azure native disaster recovery service. Previously known as Microsoft Azure Hyper-V Recovery Manager.
666 questions
0 comments No comments
{count} votes

Accepted answer
  1. SadiqhAhmed-MSFT 39,916 Reputation points Microsoft Employee
    2022-11-10T19:27:35.273+00:00

    @KFM Thank you for posting your question on Microsoft Q&A forum. Happy to assist!

    As far your question, the clarification given by MS support is correct. RSV redundancy doesn't apply or ASR, managed disks are always LRS. So, it doesn't affect your ASR costing.

    259079-image.png

    FAQ reference: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/site-recovery/site-recovery-faq#if-i-replicate-to-azure--what-kind-of-storage-account-or-managed-disk-do-i-need-

    Hope this helps!

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the response helped, do "Accept Answer" and up-vote it

    0 comments No comments

0 additional answers

Sort by: Most helpful