How to get id value when try to loop within repeater control?

Ahmed Salah Abed Elaziz 390 Reputation points

I working on web forms. I can't get value of id inside repeater control.

i need to get id when loop within repeater control

string Id = gvr.Items[5].ToString();

what I do within code is :

1- click on print button to update status column on database based on id if checkbox checked

2- then after that will loop within repeater control to get checkbox value have checked true

3-get id from repeater and update on database column status with true when checkbox checked is true .

what I try as below :

protected void Print_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
        int counter = 0;
        foreach (RepeaterItem gvr in repPSStatus.Items)

            if (((System.Web.UI.WebControls.CheckBox)gvr.FindControl("chkSel")).Checked == true)
                string Id = gvr.Items[5].ToString();// here is issue 
                string msg = busiObj.updatestatus(Id);
                if (msg == "SUCCESS")
                    counter = counter + 1;


and on reprint.aspx page

    <asp:Repeater runat="server" ID="repPSStatus">
A set of technologies in the .NET Framework for building web applications and XML web services.
3,235 questions
An object-oriented and type-safe programming language that has its roots in the C family of languages and includes support for component-oriented programming.
10,168 questions
{count} votes

2 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Ahmed Salah Abed Elaziz 390 Reputation points

    what i need actually get value of id that have checkbox checked

    i need to modify this line to get id value from repeater

    string Id = gvr.Items[id].ToString();// here is issue

  2. Jose Zero 576 Reputation points

    Your code do not show what is inside Repeater, we have no idea what is inside, it can have just a control or a bunch of nested controls.
    Best I can suggest (following AgaveJoe), is use FindControl as you made to get Checkbox.Checked.
    Use grv.Items[5].FindControl(<place control ID here>)

    0 comments No comments