This browser is no longer supported.
Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.
Hello,
We work in hybrid environment, with Intune only and co-managed machines.
I assume that there might be some delays in communication between SCCM agent and Cloud Management Gateway, and also I change compliance policy during the testing phase(first started without grace period, then added 7 days, then 30 days)...
Why does some device is in "grace period" and other one is "not-compliant" if they have the same issue that have to be fixed to become "compliant"? Could it be related to policy updates that I made for grace period while testing?
In-grace period: The device is targeted with one or more device compliance policy settings. But, the user hasn’t applied the policies yet. This means the device is not-compliant, but it’s in the grace-period defined by the admin.
Not-compliant: The device failed to apply one or more device compliance policy settings. Or, the user hasn’t complied with the policies.
The main question is - Should each device first fall into a grace period before becoming not-compliant?
Just thinking about possible reasons.
Thanks!
I prepared new machine to test this again with different policy and it became not-compliant 15 minutes after enrollment.
However, my compliance policy has this setting:
I would expect that machine is in grace period for 2 days and after that to be not-compliant and after that receive an email. Am I right?
I have noticed that Intune is slow with syncing these policies, statuses,... and we have to be patient while testing this and give it some time.
Thanks
I tested it again and again and finally achieved the "in grace period" status :)
Configuration looks good now.
I did tests with existing policy and without grace period configured, then my devices became not-compliant and after that I changed some settings, grace period in days,... and that applied only to new devices.
When I created a new policy and applied it to a new device it fell into the grace period.
As I already said, need to be patient and give it some time and test it again and again.
![](data:image/svg+xml, %3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' height='64' class='font-weight-bold' style='font: 600 30.11764705882353px "SegoeUI", Arial' width='64'%3E%3Ccircle fill='hsl(313.6, 38%, 40%)' cx='32' cy='32' r='32' /%3E%3Ctext x='50%25' y='55%25' dominant-baseline='middle' text-anchor='middle' fill='%23FFF' %3EAM%3C/text%3E%3C/svg%3E)
run a script to make it complaint
![](data:image/svg+xml, %3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' height='64' class='font-weight-bold' style='font: 600 30.11764705882353px "SegoeUI", Arial' width='64'%3E%3Ccircle fill='hsl(256, 65%, 34%)' cx='32' cy='32' r='32' /%3E%3Ctext x='50%25' y='55%25' dominant-baseline='middle' text-anchor='middle' fill='%23FFF' %3ERD%3C/text%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Run what script???