This is an ongoing issue and the situation is getting worse, not better. I've worked US DOD, national security level security with counter intel training.
First and foremost and to be absolutely, incredibly, perfectly clear -
Microsoft and it's employees are NOT within my circle of trust. The same is true for all software vendors.
That said, we have no choice but to allow them within our walls but we must retain our rights to control our own security - especially setting our passwords and where they are stored.
A 4 digit pin is 1e4 possible values - 10,000
My system login password, which IS DIFFERENT from my microsoft password is 22 characters with 64 possible values that's 64^22 (5.44e39) possible values which is stored in two places - my head and my password keeper. My microsoft account has a different equally difficult password, also stored in the password keeper. The password to the password keeper is yet another cryptic mangle equally hard to break.
If the advertising of my password keeper's authors is correct, those passwords are encrypted on their server and they are NOT microsoft. Cracking the password keeper is a single point of vulnerability. In security, redundancy LOWERS security because penetrating one penetrates all and single point is best.
And, since no one else knows how many digits my password REALLY is (and I lied about the 22), someone would have to test all possible lengths from 8 to 128, which makes that 6.5e41.
The enigma machine was only 1.5e20.
While a 4 digit pin is better than using a password like "password" or "cutedoggy" and that may be what the average MS home user would use otherwise - for those of us who need REAL security or work for companies which REQUIRE real security - a 4 digit pin is A JOKE!!!
The default should be the a real password and the 4 digit pin should be THE OPTION for users who don't need so much security and under no circumstances should MS be trying to persuade those of who seem to know a lot more than they do that a 1 in 10,000 chance is safer than a 1 in 65,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 chance.
We take it on FAITH that the software we use, which reads our raw credentials, did not pass them on to the vendor using vendor encryption - man in the middle attack. And having worked for multibillion dollar revenue software vendors, I will testify before congress that NONE of the people writing this stuff was bonded, passed security investigations and neither have the people inspecting their work - if it's inspected at all.
The real hypocrisy is bragging about 64 or 128 bit encryption making us safer, while leveraging us into using such unsafe keys. It doesn't matter how good the lock on your front door is if you hang the key on the outside wall.
For those of you who think my paranoia level is too high, because of the work I do - someone hacked my old 12 digit password on my email server and erased one critical document. My memory is unclear, but I was pretty sure I kept a copy on my machine. Both vanished. The document was written around 2022 and could not be located in 2024. When I spotted that, that's when I required all of my staff and myself to start using the maximum length, unbreakable passwords the system allows.
And now, that requirement is costing us about 2-4 hours of labor undoing this BS MS has forced upon us. Or, we could just broadcast everything we're doing everywhere and save the effort. FYI, our work focuses on reversing climate change and putting the fossil fuel industry out of business before the mass extinction. I doubt I'll even live that long but you probably will. This isn't for me, it's for all of you reading this and your children.
Because of the nature of the document, I'm guessing that was someone in US or UK Gov Security. That's because they were the recipient of the document. That was being hacked by an ALLY who removed proof of their own security flaws so other ALLIES didn't know how stupid they were.
I demand the right to remove all this faux security and all AI, which was developed with equally shoddy safeguards, from my system entirely.
I demand the right to make this OPT IN and not OPT OUT.
It's not that I don't trust it, I DO NOT TRUST ITS AUTHORS. Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon et. al. ARE NOT within my circle of trust. Please don't take offense, on some stuff my own friends and family aren't either.
Don't try to persuade the uneducated that this for their own good so you can entrap them in your software ecosystem by lying to them that "this is more secure." Yeah, it's more secure than no password at all, but that is not the same thing.
Bob Tipton
Cofounder Hughes Skunk Works.