A community member has associated this post with a similar question:
Can we reframe one AI900 question such that it should specifically mention the details for which the question is asked
Only moderators can edit this content.
Reframe another question
In Azure AI900 Practice Assessment Test, their is one question which I think can be reframed.
the question is -
'''''
Predicting rainfall for a specific geographical location is an example of which type of machine learning?
Select only one answer.
classification
clustering
featurization
regression
'''''''
And the correct answer to this question is - Regression..
My doubt is - Can we reframe this question because Predicting seems confusing..
This doubt I asked to Copilot & below is its response:
'''''''''''''''''
You're absolutely right to reflect on the wording of the question—language matters a lot in machine learning problem framing.
✅ Why “Predicting Rainfall” Can Be Confusing
The term “predicting” is broad and can apply to:
- Classification: e.g., “Will it rain today?” → Yes/No
- Regression: e.g., “How much will it rain today?” → 12.4 mm
So when you read:
“Predicting rainfall for a specific geographical location…”
It’s natural to interpret it as a Yes/No question (classification), especially if the context isn’t clear.
✅ Better Wording for Regression Context
To clearly indicate that the task involves predicting a continuous value, the question could be rephrased as:
- “Estimating the amount of rainfall for a specific location is an example of which type of machine learning?”
- “Forecasting rainfall in millimeters for a region is an example of…”
- “Quantifying expected rainfall at a location…”
These versions make it clear that the output is numerical, not categorical.
🧠 Tip for Real-World ML Design
When designing ML systems or exam questions, always clarify:
- What is being predicted?
- What is the format of the output? (numeric vs. label)
- What is the use case? (e.g., weather forecasting, alert systems)
✅ Final Clarification
Task | Output | ML Type |
---|---|---|
Will it rain today? | Yes / No | Classification |
Will it rain today? | Yes / No | Classification |
How much will it rain today? | e.g., 15.2 mm | Regression |
So yes, your instinct is correct: the wording can lead to ambiguity, and refining it helps ensure the intended ML type is clearly understood.
Would you like help rewording other ML-related questions or designing a quiz with clear distinctions between classification, regression, and clustering?You're absolutely right to reflect on the wording of the question—language matters a lot in machine learning problem framing.
✅ Why “Predicting Rainfall” Can Be Confusing
The term “predicting” is broad and can apply to:
- Classification: e.g., “Will it rain today?” → Yes/No
- Regression: e.g., “How much will it rain today?” → 12.4 mm
So when you read:
“Predicting rainfall for a specific geographical location…”
It’s natural to interpret it as a Yes/No question (classification), especially if the context isn’t clear.
✅ Better Wording for Regression Context
To clearly indicate that the task involves predicting a continuous value, the question could be rephrased as:
- “Estimating the amount of rainfall for a specific location is an example of which type of machine learning?”
- “Forecasting rainfall in millimeters for a region is an example of…”
- “Quantifying expected rainfall at a location…”
These versions make it clear that the output is numerical, not categorical.
🧠 Tip for Real-World ML Design
When designing ML systems or exam questions, always clarify:
- What is being predicted?
- What is the format of the output? (numeric vs. label)
- What is the use case? (e.g., weather forecasting, alert systems)
✅ Final Clarification
Task | Output | ML Type |
---|---|---|
Will it rain today? | Yes / No | Classification |
How much will it rain today? | e.g., 15.2 mm | Regression |
So yes, your instinct is correct: the wording can lead to ambiguity, and refining it helps ensure the intended ML type is clearly understood.
Would you like help rewording other ML-related questions or designing a quiz with clear distinctions between classification, regression, and clustering?
''''''''''''''''
So Team, can we reframe the question as "Estimating the amount of rainfall in a particular location is an example of?"
Need your guidance on this. thanks