This browser is no longer supported.
Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.
![](data:image/svg+xml, %3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' height='64' class='font-weight-bold' style='font: 600 30.11764705882353px "SegoeUI", Arial' width='64'%3E%3Ccircle fill='hsl(28.799999999999997, 23%, 12%)' cx='32' cy='32' r='32' /%3E%3Ctext x='50%25' y='55%25' dominant-baseline='middle' text-anchor='middle' fill='%23FFF' %3EA%3C/text%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Hi,
The very good IDE-independent standalone J-Link debugger Ozone from Segger has very good support for major RTOSes through RTOS awareness:
https://www.segger.com/products/development-tools/ozone-j-link-debugger/technology/rtos-awareness/
Surprisingly, there is no official plugin for ThreadX. There is a project on GitHub
https://github.com/fzawadiak/Ozone-ThreadX
adding some support, but I'd like to see an official plugin from Microsoft that adds full Ozone support for Cortex-M4 / M7.
As ThreadX is now available through many MCU vendors this will definitely help during development.
UPDATE: The same request applies to adding ThreadX support to Segger's SystemView which is a very advanced runtime analayzer:
https://www.segger.com/products/development-tools/systemview/
I really hope that such support will be added as it is highly requested by developers using professional Segger tools for debugging.
Thanks in advance,
Anguel
![](data:image/svg+xml, %3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' height='64' class='font-weight-bold' style='font: 600 30.11764705882353px "SegoeUI", Arial' width='64'%3E%3Ccircle fill='hsl(25.6, 6%, 12%)' cx='32' cy='32' r='32' /%3E%3Ctext x='50%25' y='55%25' dominant-baseline='middle' text-anchor='middle' fill='%23FFF' %3ESA%3C/text%3E%3C/svg%3E)
We do not make or maintain ThreadX plugins. That is up to each tool vendor to provide.
That‘s too bad. They probably won‘t, because they have their own RTOS they want to sell. Btw, FreeRTOS is fully supported by these tools, so this is unfortunately a big obstacle to switch to Azure RTOS and having to leave behind my professional debug tools which are extremely important for RTOS development. Well, I posted this request, of course you have to decide which developers you are targeting and what is important for you to make people use Azure RTOS.
![](data:image/svg+xml, %3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' height='64' class='font-weight-bold' style='font: 600 30.11764705882353px "SegoeUI", Arial' width='64'%3E%3Ccircle fill='hsl(9.6, 23%, 10%)' cx='32' cy='32' r='32' /%3E%3Ctext x='50%25' y='55%25' dominant-baseline='middle' text-anchor='middle' fill='%23FFF' %3EGS%3C/text%3E%3C/svg%3E)
I have to agree with Anguel. Professional hw interface tools play a key role in productive embedded development. Ignoring this aspect feels like a mistake that competitors will benefit from.
![](data:image/svg+xml, %3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' height='64' class='font-weight-bold' style='font: 600 30.11764705882353px "SegoeUI", Arial' width='64'%3E%3Ccircle fill='hsl(54.400000000000006, 38%, 15%)' cx='32' cy='32' r='32' /%3E%3Ctext x='50%25' y='55%25' dominant-baseline='middle' text-anchor='middle' fill='%23FFF' %3EQ%3C/text%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Hello @George Small
As it turns out at this time the product feature you are looking for is not supported. May I request you to please log the same on the IDEAS portal? Please use the category 'Other' if you don't find the exact product tag. Please do let us know the posted link of your feedback!
The product group does monitor the request and they can plan for the implementation in the future. Once you log the feature request you will also be notified of the status of the request. We expect you to keep using this forum and motivate others to do the same. You can always help other community members by answering their queries.
Thanks
I just posted the idea per your suggestion. I posted under 'Azure IoT edge' category.
https://feedback.azure.com/d365community/idea/b074d0af-2da8-ec11-a81c-000d3adfb8f5?q=segger
Thanks,
George
Well 6 months and no response. With so many new-to-embedded cloud and web developers moving into embedded IoT space, I'm not sure a community voting mechanism is the best way to prioritize an embedded RTOS product direction. Oh well.
Hello @George Small Sorry for the delayed response.
We have created an internal Feedback submission on top of your submitted idea. Microsoft team will respond to your idea soon.
Please send an email to us for further discussion.
This thread discussion was very old, and somehow i missed the alert, so sorry for that!!!
Could you please create a new thread if you still looking for any further assistance? we are happy to help you further.
we will close this thread and please create a new thread so that we can help you better.