@Eduardo
0) Is the task plan correct or any suggestion for change?
Before putting node 1 into maintenance, change public DNS to node 2 to make sure the access from Internet. If you don’t need external access for a short time, you can ignore this step
1) To apply the cu21 on node2 and taking into account the current scenario, can it be done without loss of service? Do we understand that it would be transparent to the active services in node1 or should it be convenient to put both nodes under maintenance and plan outage?
You need to update them one by one, you cannot put both of them into maintenance. For more detailed information about putting DAG member into maintenance, you can have a look about this article: Performing maintenance on DAG members
2) After updating node2, we would pass the active bases from node1 to node2 and we would put node1 in maintenance mode to continue with the update, then, there would be some incompatibility issue in case of tracing the bases of node2 understanding that we are going from node1 (cu11) to node2 (cu21)?
Exchange DAG members could in a different CU for a period of time, and CU differences will not be a problem.
If the response is helpful, please click "Accept Answer" and upvote it.
Note: Please follow the steps in our documentation to enable e-mail notifications if you want to receive the related email notification for this thread.