Hi ,
Thanks for reaching out to Microsoft Q&A.
Yes, you should still implement schema enforcement at the Silver layer even if you are using Auto Loader. Auto Loader helps at ingestion, but Silver is where you assert data contracts for your organization.
- Auto Loader already helps, but it is not enforcement by itself
Databricks Auto Loader does schema evolution (handle new columns, column renames, type widening, etc.) and schema drift detection.
However, that is more about ingestion flexibility. It does not guarantee that your downstream layers (Silver/Gold) remain in a known, trusted shape.
- Silver layer’s responsibility
Silver is your curated, standardized layer. By the time data reaches Silver, you want it to follow business-approved, stable schemas.
Hence, Silver should enforce schema. Any schema drift captured by Auto Loader in Bronze should be reviewed, mapped, and only then promoted to Silver.
- How to enforce
Use Delta Lake’s mergeSchema = false (default) and explicitly define schemas for Silver tables.
- For incoming changes, build governance around it:
Detect drift in Bronze with Auto Loader.
Review it (maybe log to a “schema change tracking” table).
- Decide if it is valid -> update Silver schema and ETL.
- Otherwise -> reject/quarantine.
- Gold layer
Gold is consumption-oriented (BI models, ML features, marts). By then, schema enforcement is implicit because Silver has already enforced a clean schema.
In Gold, you might only need light enforcement (ensuring certain business KPIs exist, data types align with BI/ML tools, etc.).
- Best practice (short version)
- Bronze: Accept anything > Auto Loader handles drift.
Silver: Enforce schema explicitly. No blind schema evolution. This is where you “lock in” the trusted data contracts.
- Gold: Consume with confidence -> optional enforcement, more about semantic consistency than technical schema.
Please 'Upvote'(Thumbs-up) and 'Accept' as answer if the reply was helpful. This will be benefitting other community members who face the same issue.