Hello Hayes,
"The Simple and Protected Generic Security Service Application Program Interface (GSS-API) Negotiation Mechanism" is documented in RFC 4178 and section 4.2.2 describes the meaning of "accept-incomplete" as:
At least one additional negotiation message from the peer is needed to establish the security context.
It is informational rather than an error condition and the subsequent two packets in your network trace show that an additional negotiation message is indeed exchanged. The Wireshark screen snapshot seems to show that the session setup is completed successfully.
The reason why the TCP connection is reset is not visible in the network trace; I would suggest using the Microsoft-Windows-SMBClient ETW provider to see if that contains any information about the cause of the disconnection.
If you trace a successful connection to an SMB share using NTLM authentication, you should see the same "accept-incomplete" data there too.
There is no need to conceal private networking addressing (e.g. 192.168.X.X addresses) - the numbers are completely useless/meaningless outside of the private network. I spent more time wondering why that information had been concealed than analysing the rest of the data :-)
Gary