Azure Iot Central Raw Data Not Showing For Specific Devices

Brycen Dhom 11 Reputation points
2022-02-01T19:35:56.97+00:00

We (client and I) have several (10+) IoT devices that have been sending messages to Azure throughout most of January successfully and some months before as well. Just recently two of the devices have stopped filling out the "Raw Data" view. These devices are definitely still communicating to Azure as there is a custom view set up for Azure and the properties are being accepted on a defined interval on these two devices. Client-side, the program seems to run as expected. I.e. I am seeing the status codes that are expected from the SDK.

Also, these devices had been able to send data to central before. It started showing this behavior a week ago. We have tried deleting the devices from central as well as blocking and unblocking them.

The Azure-iot-sdk-c is being used (with the provisioning client) to provision, assign a model ID, and send data. The SDK version is 1.3.4. The current subscription plan is the basic plan.

My theories are:
* Some new bug with Azure IoT Central
* A limit was hit on the basic plan that I am not aware of
* Issue with outdated SDK (appears to be from July 2019 though)

Azure IoT Central
Azure IoT Central
An Azure hosted internet of things (IoT) application platform.
354 questions
Azure IoT Hub
Azure IoT Hub
An Azure service that enables bidirectional communication between internet of things (IoT) devices and applications.
1,136 questions
Azure IoT SDK
Azure IoT SDK
An Azure software development kit that facilitates building applications that connect to Azure IoT services.
208 questions
{count} votes

1 answer

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. QuantumCache 20,031 Reputation points
    2022-02-16T20:38:21.14+00:00

    Hello @Brycen Dhom ,

    Sorry for the inconvenience caused in this matter, we see that the issue is now resolved by the Microsoft Product Team.

    Please comment in the below section if you need further help in this matter! happy to help!

    IoT Central development team fixed the issue.

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments