Azure Function Unique Name

Andy 1 Reputation point
2020-09-12T15:09:24.267+00:00

Hello,

I've been advised by Azure support to raise this issue, although it seems obvious what the issue is from the error message --> "Error: The name "<redacted>-<Redacted>-functions-app" used for the Function App needs to be globally unique and isn't available: Hostname '<redacted>-<Redacted>-functions-app' already exists. Please select a different name."

For context, we have a suite of services that are deployed multiple times a day/week using terraform as our automation tool of choice. Since yesterday one of our test services is no longer deployable because the app name is no longer unique. I understand that the name has to be unique, which is accepted. What is puzzling is that our automation destroys and creates the function-app in what is only a few seconds, so its strange that the app has been registered elsewhere, in addition the name is quite unique so that makes this a bit more puzzling.

For reference this isn't just an issue in terraform, it's not possible to create the function app with the same name via the Azure portal. It's also not possible to reach that addressable name via ping or http. Azure support have advised that they did some cache busting behind the scenes, but it has now been over 24hrs since the app was originally destroyed

Is it possible that the app has not been destroyed fully and is still lurking around in the backend of Azure somewhere?

Thanks

Azure Functions
Azure Functions
An Azure service that provides an event-driven serverless compute platform.
4,605 questions
{count} votes

1 answer

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. JayaC-MSFT 5,526 Reputation points
    2020-09-19T15:00:51.097+00:00

    anonymous user-7645 We have taken it up offline and checked that the name of the function app was not available even after deleting the site as the request was stuck at our Geo master level. We have internally performed necessary actions to resolve the issue. In similar cases, please reach out to MS support at the earliest.

    0 comments No comments