Share via


Breaking into the virtual environment in App-V 5.0

This post has moved here

Comments

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    I see it properly in Local Registry under AppvClientPackages dont see it when virtual registry is launched. I tried different options like /appvve & /appvpid as well but same resutls. Any ideans on where I might be doing wrong

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Do you see the virtual system okay?

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Are you sure they aren't just there under the Program Files x86 location?

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Not much difference Anil, check out this post for a full explanation: blogs.technet.com/.../app-v-5-0-launching-native-local-processes-within-the-virtual-environment.aspx

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Thanks!

  • Anonymous
    December 15, 2012
    Go on you legend ! :)

  • Anonymous
    February 01, 2013
    Great Work....!

  • Anonymous
    February 26, 2013
    Thanks, very helpful

  • Anonymous
    April 10, 2013
    Thanks for the information, yay

  • Anonymous
    April 12, 2013
    What are the pros and cons (if any) of using this method as opposed to using /appvve or /appvpid switches?

  • Anonymous
    May 14, 2013
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    May 15, 2013
    Thanks for you reply. What I'm trying to achieve: I built this "launcher" which is capable of handling several application virtualization types in a uniform way (App-V 4.x, Symantec SWV, VMware ThinApp and now App-V 5). After using a special shortcut or file type association the launcher will import/load/stream the application after which it can be customized/personalized INSIDE the VE. As App-V 5 seems more similar to Symantec SWV than to App-V 4.6, I wondered if it might have the same functionality (like injecting a process into a VE, for which SWV has an API). In my case it would just improve performance, that's all.

  • Anonymous
    October 09, 2013
    Having said that, I have just found out from a colleague that the problem is with the Parent directory choice during sequencing.  If you use c:program files as parent directory  instead of choing the actual installation directory c:program filesAdobe, then there is a chance that you do see the application folders within the bubble.  Good to know anyway although I won't sequence in this manner anyway

  • Anonymous
    October 09, 2013
    Whoops it seems my first post didn't get published.  ok the post  above is to follow on the fact that on x64 bit Windows I can never see the program directories within the bubbles say under c:program files, and this using any methods /appvid or powershell etc.. and then a colleague told me about the above.  I think the problem is only with x64 bit.