Select Assemblies Referenced By Projects
Assemblies are used in two different ways during a build. The first is for compile, which allows the package consumer's code to compile against APIs in the assembly, and for Intellisense to give suggestions. The second is runtime, where the assembly is copied to the
bin directory and is used during program execution. Some package authors would like only their own assemblies (or a subset of their assemblies) available to their package consumers at compile time, but need to provide all their dependencies for runtime. This document looks at ways to achieve this outcome.
Recommended: One assembly per package
Our recommendation is to have one package per assembly, and package dependencies to other assemblies. When NuGet restores a project, it does asset selection and supports including, excluding, and making private different asset classes. In order to prevent your package's dependencies from becoming compile time assets for anyone using your package, you can make
compile assets private. In the generated package, that will cause
compile to be excluded from the dependency. Note that the default private assets when none is supplied is
contentfiles;build;analyzers. Therefore, you should use
PrivateAssets="compile;contentfiles;build;analyzers" in your
<ItemGroup> <ProjectReference Include="..\OtherProject\OtherProject.csproj" PrivateAssets="compile;contentfiles;build;analyzers" /> <PackageReference Include="SomePackage" Version="1.2.3" PrivateAssets="compile;contentfiles;build;analyzers" /> </ItemGroup>
If you are creating a package from a custom
nuspec file, rather than letting NuGet auto-generate one for you, your
nuspec should use the
exclude XML attribute .
<dependencies> <group targetFramework=".NETFramework4.8"> <dependency id="OtherProject" version="3.2.1" exclude="Compile,Build,Analyzers" /> <dependency id="SomePackage" version="1.2.3" exclude="Compile,Build,Analyzers" /> </group> </dependencies>
There are three reasons why this is the recommended solution.
Firstly, useful assemblies often get referenced by new assemblies/packages. While a utility assembly might be intended to only be used by a single package today, making it tempting to ship both assemblies in a single package, if a second package wants to use the "private" utility assembly in the future, either the utility assembly needs to be moved into a new package and the old package needs to be updated to declare it as a dependency, or the utility package needs to ship in both the existing and the new package. If the assembly ships in two different packages, and a project references both packages, if there are different versions of the utility assembly in the two packages, NuGet will be unable to assist in version management.
Secondly, there may be times that the developers using your package want to also use APIs from your dependencies. For example, consider the package Microsoft.ServiceHub.Client version 3.0.3078. If you download the package and check the
nuspec file, you can see that it lists two packages starting with
Microsoft.VisualStudio. as dependencies, meaning it needs them at runtime, but it also excludes their compile assets. This means that projects using Microsoft.ServiceHub.Client will not have the Visual Studio APIs available in IntelliSense or if they build the project, unless the project explicit installs those packages. And this is the advantage that a package dependency with an exclude asset has. Projects using your package, if they want to use your dependencies as well, they can add a reference to the package to make the APIs available to themselves.
Finally, some package authors have been confused in the past about NuGet's assembly selection for packages supporting more than one target framework when their package also contains multiple assemblies. If your main assembly supports different target frameworks to your utility assembly, it may not be obvious which
lib/ directories to put all of the assemblies into. By separating each package by assembly name, it's more intuitive which
lib/ folders each assembly should go into. Note, this does not mean having
Package1.net6.0 packages. It means having
Package2. When Nuget restores a project, Nuget will independently do asset selection for the two packages.
Also note that dependency include/exclude assets is only used by projects using PackageReference. Any project installing your package using
packages.config will install your dependencies and have its APIs available as well.
packages.config is only supported by Visual Studio's older .NET Framework project templates. SDK style projects, even those targeting .NET Framework, do not support
packages.config, and therefore do support dependency include/exclude assets.
Not recommended: Multiple assemblies in one package
packages.config have different features available. Whether you want to support your package consumers who use
packages.config, or both, changes how you must author your package.
NuGet's MSBuild Pack target does not support automatically including project references in the package. It will only list those referenced projects as package dependencies. There is an issue on GitHub, where community members shared ways they achieved this outcome, which usually involves using
PackagePath MSBuild item metadata to place files anywhere in the package, as described in the docs on including content in a package, and using
SuppressDependenciesWhenPacking to avoid the project references becoming package dependencies. There also exist community developed tools that can be used as an alternative to NuGet's official pack, which support this feature.
When a package consumer uses
PackageReference, NuGet selects compile and runtime assets independently, as previously described.
Compile assets prefer
ref/<tfm>/*.dll (for example
ref/net6.0/*.dll), but if that does not exist, then it will fall back to
lib/<tfm>/*.dll (for example
Runtime assets prefer
runtimes/<rid>/lib/<tfm>/*.dll (for example (
runtimes/win11-x64/lib/net6.0/*.dll)), but if that does not exist, then it will fall back to
Since assemblies in
ref\<tfm>\ are not used at runtime, they may be metadata-only assemblies to reduce package size.
packages.config to manage NuGet packages normally add references to all assemblies in the
lib\<tfm>\ directory. The
ref\ directory was added to support
PackageReference and therefore isn't considered when using
packages.config. To explicitly set which assemblies are referenced for projects using
packages.config, the package must use the
<references> element in the nuspec file. For example:
<references> <group targetFramework="net45"> <reference file="MyLibrary.dll" /> </group> </references>
The MSBuild pack targets don't support the
<references> element. See the docs on packing using a .nuspec file when using MSBuild pack.
packages.config project use a process called ResolveAssemblyReference to copy assemblies to the
bin\<configuration>\ output directory. Your project's assembly is copied, then the build system looks at the assembly manifest for referenced assemblies, then copies those assemblies and recursively repeats for all assemblies. This means that if any of the assemblies loaded only by reflection (
Assembly.Load, MEF or another dependency injection framework), then it may not be copied to your project's
bin\<configuration>\ output directory despite being in
bin\<tfm>\. This also means that this only works for .NET assemblies, not for native code called with P/Invoke.
If a package contains the nuspec
<references> element and does not contain assemblies in
ref\<tfm>\, NuGet will advertise the assemblies listed in the nuspec
<references> element as both the compile and runtime assets. This means there will be runtime exceptions when the referenced assemblies need to load any other assembly in the
lib\<tfm>\ directory. Therefore, it is important to use both the nuspec
packages.config support, as well as duplicating assemblies in the
ref/ folder for
PackageReference support. The
runtimes/ package folder does not need to be used, it was added to the above section for completeness.
My package will contain three assemblies,
MyUtilities.dll, which are targeting the .NET Framework 4.7.2.
MyUtilities.dll contains classes intended to be used only by the other two assemblies, so I don't want to make those classes available in IntelliSense or at compile time to projects using my package. My
nuspec file needs to contain the following XML elements:
<references> <group targetFramework="net472"> <reference file="MyLib.dll" /> <reference file="MyHelpers.dll" /> </group> </references>
I need to ensure my package contents are:
lib\net472\MyLib.dll lib\net472\MyHelpers.dll lib\net472\MyUtilities.dll ref\net472\MyLib.dll ref\net472\MyHelpers.dll
Submit and view feedback for