This browser is no longer supported.
Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.
What is the most reliable way to prevent planless execution from being merged?
Ask the agent to be careful.
Require a plan template only.
Make a plan check a required status check and require pull request reviews.
Allow direct pushes but require tests.
Which GitHub feature most directly routes reviews based on changed file paths?
Issues
CODEOWNERS
Actions artifacts
Releases
In a plan-act-evaluate architecture, where should evaluation evidence primarily live?
Only inside the agent's private logs
In PR comments only
In GitHub-native artifacts like workflow runs, checks, and uploaded artifacts
In a separate external document
Which design best expresses risk-based autonomy for production deployments?
Let the agent deploy after tests pass
Use GitHub Environments with required reviewers for production
Allow direct pushes to main
Disable workflow approvals
Which is an architectural anti-pattern in agent design?
Clear success criteria
Required checks
Mixed planning and execution with no inspectable plan
Uploading artifacts
You must answer all questions before checking your work.
Was this page helpful?
Need help with this topic?
Want to try using Ask Learn to clarify or guide you through this topic?