Why isn't the Firefox code signed?

I'm having a look @ Firefox and have noticed that the code is not signed and therefore it's theoretically possible for a trojan to have been inserted in it.

Comments

• Anonymous
  November 22, 2004
  The comment has been removed
• Anonymous
  November 22, 2004
  The comment has been removed
• Anonymous
  November 22, 2004
  RMS, you totally missed the point for "signed" code.
• Anonymous
  November 22, 2004
  The comment has been removed
• Anonymous
  November 22, 2004
  yeah, RMS (you are not the RMS, are you?). you and I know exactly that once Firefox has the userbase IE has now, it will no longer be 'more secure' than IE.
• Anonymous
  November 22, 2004
  Please take down your blog, this posts is so stupid, you don't deserve to pollute the Internet.
• Anonymous
  November 22, 2004
  Port - everyone's entitled to an opinion - hence I've posted your feedback!
  
  If you don't want to read my opinion then don't read my Blog.
• Anonymous
  November 22, 2004
  The comment has been removed
• Anonymous
  November 22, 2004
  well it is pgp sigened. they probably think that is good enough.
  
• Anonymous
  November 22, 2004
  I'll follow Claude's sugggestion of posting to MozillaZine.
  
  The aim of this post was to find out WHY the code wasn't signed. I was not aiming for an IE versus Firefox argument. IE's clearly had security vulnerabilities, Firefox is new and hasn't had any.
  
  Thanks for all of the feedback.
• Anonymous
  November 23, 2004
  The Mozilla Firefox browser comes pre-loaded with spyware, but their users are just too clever for them:http://www.cebit.de/newsanzeige_e.html?multi=1&back=/homepage_e&news=11982&back=%2Fhomepage_e&x=1
  
  Nobody is pure of heart…