Note
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try signing in or changing directories.
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try changing directories.
Harry has hit the nail on the head. Again.
Comments
- Anonymous
February 24, 2005
I don't think I could have put it better than Harry myself.
Though I still like the idea of using a generic language (i.e UML) at the conceptual level, specifically because its implementation architecture neutral.
Am I right in assuming that VS2005 DSL's use XML to persist their domain models? If so then its not beyond the wit of man to think that I could use UML at the conceptual level, export it in XMI and then use XSLT to translate it into DSL for design. OK I might lose something in the translation but it's a comforting thought that it might turn out to be interoperable. - Anonymous
February 25, 2005
Fred
Yes, DSLs are persisted using XML; we have certainly thought of the scenario that you suggest; and this kind of interoperability is definitely on our radar. You might even want to use our tools at the conceptual level too.
-- Steve - Anonymous
February 25, 2005
Thanks Steve! :)