Note
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try signing in or changing directories.
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try changing directories.
Discussion continues here in content development about whether/the extent to which customers care who develops content – as long as they can distinguish that the information is “supported”. The debate covers a broad range of suggestions, from putting author’s actual names on content (do you care?)
to tracking/reporting all a writer’s activities across TN/MSDN, blogs, forums, the twitterverse, etc.
It is also performance review time at Microsoft, which drives some (thankfully only once-yearly) bizarre behavior. For example, my review process this year includes some “360 feedback” (don’t panic, I initiated it). One website that purports to help with this provided me the following “brand map” of brand tonyso:
Attributes:
- Community-oriented
- Discerning
- Ethical
- Persuasive
- Self-motivated
- Strategic
- Visionary
Brand Skills:
- Innovating
- Presenting
- Learning
- Visioning
- Performing analysis
- Identifying problems
Projective Exercises:
Apparently,
“if I were a dog, I’d be a greyhound, moves fast and hits his own personal target”.
“if I were a car, I’d be a Mustang, runs on lots of power underneath.”
Just curious – any of this come across in the blog? If so, why? For example, if you, dear reader, from reading the blog, find me overly-sycophantic, do please explain why :-)
Perhaps this “internet brand management” is just Myers-Briggs repackaged and updated for the 20-somethings? (I’m an ENTJ, BTW)
Oh, and if you know of an IT Pro job description that covers the visionary-visioning thing – please share.
